(((Anne Wojcicki))) is the CEO of 23AndMe, is the world's largest DNA collection company. Anne Wojcicki was married to Google founder (((Sergey Brin))) and is the sister of YouTube CEO (((Susan Wojcicki))).
'More of those coincidences that Q keeps mentioning?
Posted this on another thread too, but I think everyone is getting this wrong. This is a list "Adverse Events of Special Interest", meaning if they see any of these adverse events, then that is of interest. This is not saying these are the adverse events seen in the trial
From page 16:
The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished guideline).
The AESI terms are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their association with severe COVID-19 and events of interest for vaccines in general.
I think what you're looking for is pg16 Table 7, that has actual numbers and what was observed. Which is still massive btw, but that page 30 is simply listing what kinds of adverse events they are interested in.
What gets me is we now have proof, though more comes out, that the drug companies withheld info that should have been considered before getting jabbed for informed consent. So supposedly they cant get sued for ill effects, I would think they could be sued for hiding important info.
I suspect the list is so long because every organ is saturated with spike proteins and shredded by graphine razor blades.
What are the chances that these three Big Pharma CEOs independently developed Covid vaccines that mega-kill white people without harming Jews?
(((Anne Wojcicki))) is the CEO of 23AndMe, is the world's largest DNA collection company. Anne Wojcicki was married to Google founder (((Sergey Brin))) and is the sister of YouTube CEO (((Susan Wojcicki))).
'More of those coincidences that Q keeps mentioning?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/23andMe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Wojcicki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Wojcicki
Posted this on another thread too, but I think everyone is getting this wrong. This is a list "Adverse Events of Special Interest", meaning if they see any of these adverse events, then that is of interest. This is not saying these are the adverse events seen in the trial
From page 16:
I think what you're looking for is pg16 Table 7, that has actual numbers and what was observed. Which is still massive btw, but that page 30 is simply listing what kinds of adverse events they are interested in.
Or am I the one misinterpreting this? Entirely possible since medical studies are definitely not in my wheelhouse. (link for context https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf)
What gets me is we now have proof, though more comes out, that the drug companies withheld info that should have been considered before getting jabbed for informed consent. So supposedly they cant get sued for ill effects, I would think they could be sued for hiding important info.