The interesting thing about this story is that it was literally his second public act as Christ (while not admitting to it yet). He even gives a prophecy: "If you strike down this temple, I will rebuild it in 3 days" referring to his crucifixtion and resurrection 3 days later. At the very end of the paragraph, Matthew and John both state that they recalled Jesus saying this after he had perished and it strengthened their faith in Jesus Christ. That's literally future proves past.
Bear in mind the kazarians and the Catholics pope's clerics and priests plus Constantine and his cronies have all altered the Bible to suit their agendas. you cannot trust anything in there.
Certainly there are a lot of omissions and revisions. Why does the bible only mention Enoch once yet he spent 300 years walking with God? But do you suggest that the Catholics and the Khazars altered a story in the bible to mimic Q's mo?
The interesting thing about this story is that it was literally his second public act as Christ (while not admitting to it yet). He even gives a prophecy: "If you strike down this temple, I will rebuild it in 3 days" referring to his crucifixtion and resurrection 3 days later. At the very end of the paragraph, Matthew and John both state that they recalled Jesus saying this after he had perished and it strengthened their faith in Jesus Christ. That's literally future proves past.
Bear in mind the kazarians and the Catholics pope's clerics and priests plus Constantine and his cronies have all altered the Bible to suit their agendas. you cannot trust anything in there.
Certainly there are a lot of omissions and revisions. Why does the bible only mention Enoch once yet he spent 300 years walking with God? But do you suggest that the Catholics and the Khazars altered a story in the bible to mimic Q's mo?
I have no idea what was done...just know it was tampered with and of course lots of books removed