Take a copper clad lead bullet and lay it on a solid piece of steel. Take a steel faced hammer and strike the bullet with it. The bullet mushrooms flat, don't it? The steel hammer is completely without damage. Now load the same bullet into a cartridge and shoot it at the steel plate. Made a nice hole, didn't it? The same concept of the "aluminum" plane breaking through glass and steel, being ripped apart, depositing tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel throughout the building, creating a intense fire. Now find a piece of steel bar, support one end of it, and start an intense fire under the middle of it. It bent it, didn't it? Imagine that bent bar holding up twenty stories above it.
We could put forth the same lying concept without dragging in the crazy shit along with it. We are supposed be of the TRUTH, not of things we have no proof of. This garbage is no better than the left lying to us.
The building is mostly clad in glass, bro. The planes were not used to "knock" the building over, they were used to burn the building down. They chose the farthest destination for their hijacked flights because the plane would have more fuel on board. Watch the collapse, it is exactly what you would expect to see from the falling debris above hitting the next lower floor, which was not designed to absorb that kind of impact, the dust rushing out as each space was reduced from 9 foot tall to nothing, just like a bellow works.
I agree 100% that this took place with full knowledge of the cabal and our government, they ushered in the terrorists and gave them flight training, but dynamiting the building? Lunacy. Just leave the unprovable crazy shit out. Tell what we know FOR SURE.
What do you think blacksmiths do when they make a horseshoe and the like? They heat the steel, making it malleable and then beat into the shape they want. An all day fire at WTC 7 was the blacksmith, weakening the steel frame until it failed. The fire cladding proves it out. Most steel frames are coated with a 2 hour fire rated cladding. It can withstand fire for two hours. The cladding was knocked off by the collision of the plane in WTC 1 & 2, they fell within a hour. At WTC 7, the fire had to burn THROUGH the cladding, it didn't collapse until hours later.
Another proof, the 2nd building hit was hit at a much lower level than the first building. It had much more weight above the damaged area. It fell BEFORE the first building because of this weight.
I watched ten minutes, they have no understanding of construction nor of demolition, at all. It's like crazy people talking about something they have no idea about.
Someone down voted me because they didn't like my question. Not implying you did, just that there's still people that cannot fathom our government would do that, and that there was no reason for tower 7 to fall.
Take a copper clad lead bullet and lay it on a solid piece of steel. Take a steel faced hammer and strike the bullet with it. The bullet mushrooms flat, don't it? The steel hammer is completely without damage. Now load the same bullet into a cartridge and shoot it at the steel plate. Made a nice hole, didn't it? The same concept of the "aluminum" plane breaking through glass and steel, being ripped apart, depositing tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel throughout the building, creating a intense fire. Now find a piece of steel bar, support one end of it, and start an intense fire under the middle of it. It bent it, didn't it? Imagine that bent bar holding up twenty stories above it.
We could put forth the same lying concept without dragging in the crazy shit along with it. We are supposed be of the TRUTH, not of things we have no proof of. This garbage is no better than the left lying to us.
The building is mostly clad in glass, bro. The planes were not used to "knock" the building over, they were used to burn the building down. They chose the farthest destination for their hijacked flights because the plane would have more fuel on board. Watch the collapse, it is exactly what you would expect to see from the falling debris above hitting the next lower floor, which was not designed to absorb that kind of impact, the dust rushing out as each space was reduced from 9 foot tall to nothing, just like a bellow works.
I agree 100% that this took place with full knowledge of the cabal and our government, they ushered in the terrorists and gave them flight training, but dynamiting the building? Lunacy. Just leave the unprovable crazy shit out. Tell what we know FOR SURE.
then tell me how WTC 7 fell at freefall speed
What do you think blacksmiths do when they make a horseshoe and the like? They heat the steel, making it malleable and then beat into the shape they want. An all day fire at WTC 7 was the blacksmith, weakening the steel frame until it failed. The fire cladding proves it out. Most steel frames are coated with a 2 hour fire rated cladding. It can withstand fire for two hours. The cladding was knocked off by the collision of the plane in WTC 1 & 2, they fell within a hour. At WTC 7, the fire had to burn THROUGH the cladding, it didn't collapse until hours later.
Another proof, the 2nd building hit was hit at a much lower level than the first building. It had much more weight above the damaged area. It fell BEFORE the first building because of this weight.
I watched ten minutes, they have no understanding of construction nor of demolition, at all. It's like crazy people talking about something they have no idea about.
For instance,
https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/3wi7wk/images_of_the_apollo_moon_landing_sites_taken_by/
Since when is an image uploaded to imgur.com and linked to reddit.com a valid source?
Why did WTC 7 fall?
Skyscrapers fell on it.
Someone down voted me because they didn't like my question. Not implying you did, just that there's still people that cannot fathom our government would do that, and that there was no reason for tower 7 to fall.
A copper bullet isn’t going through steel. Maybe steel core ammo, but copper plated lead isn’t piercing steel.