A recent Economist article from its "The World Ahead 2022" issue mentioned that within 15 years all newly approved drugs will be based on mRNA technology. The authors of the article are biogeneticists. I don't have a link... just have the magazine in my lap. Look it up if you need to see it. I am not lying.
Anyway... it got me thinking: accepted vaccines that are mandated (for example, your child needs certain vaccines to attend school outside the home) are a form of control. What if more and more vaccines as well as drugs are mRNA-based?
If I am created in God's image, and mRNA tech changes my DNA, am I choosing to part myself from God if I receive these drugs or vaxxes? If I need a drug to cure a disease that will kill me, but the drug is mRNA based, will I choose to die of the disease, or succumb to the temptation of changing myself in order to live longer?
One could argue that improved vax technology is an outcome of our God-given intellect, and therefore as an advance in medicine.aligned with God's plan.
As for me, I will not be changing my DNA. I wonder how my decision will affect me in the coming years. Will I thus be going against this subtle mark of the beast?
IMHO - Yep! It's the lead-up to the Mark System!
I wouldn't so. Destroying God's creation made in his own image.
Matthew 24:37
But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
If you read the Book of Enoch, you'll get more information on what was happening on this planet before the Great Flood and it will really flesh out Genesis 6.
Genesis 6:1-4
1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
The sons of God AKA the angels who took human wives and had children AKA giants AKA Nephilim.
Can read a passage here in the Book of Enoch that correlates to Genesis 6 but provides additional information-
1 Enoch 6:1-7 and 1 Enoch 7:1-5
http://www.qbible.com/enoch/7.html
After these angels were cast down from heaven, they taught mankind all sorts of things, and likely they had technology even more advanced than what we had today. The dinosaurs and other giant creatures were likely the result of genetic modification.
It seems as if Satan's ultimate plan was to corrupt the DNA of all mankind to prevent the birth of the promised Savior of all mankind. It appeared he was going to accomplish his feat until the very last minute.
Noah's father Methusaleh dies and there were only 8 purebloods left on the planet. Imagine Satan being that close to "winning" only for the Great Flood to wash it all away.
After the Flood, Satan had to regroup and appears to have managed to populate the land of Canaan with more Nephilim. God ordered the Israelites to wipe them all out but they didn't.
2 Samuel 21:20
And there was yet a battle in Gath, where was a man of great stature, that had on every hand six fingers, and on every foot six toes, four and twenty in number; and he also was born to the giant.
Appears the giants had 6 fingers and toes. What's interesting is 5 fingers are a recessive gene.
Check out Rob Skiba (passed away in 2021, likely murdered on a ventilator) and LA Marzulli for more info on this topic. There are others as well, but just the names that popped up in my head.
This is very interesting stuff! Thanks
1 That's not remotely how drugs work.
2 SOME vaccines are mRNA, most are not. As of this moment, I think only the really really really old childhood vaccines are fuckery-free.
3 Ppl choose to die of disease all the time, it's your choice. There's plenty of herbals but if you want the hardcore drugs, you've got to go to big pharma.
I agree with your second points. The first point you made is accurate today. The article was explaining how mRNA technology will be employed in more than a third of new drugs (and vaccines, including remakes of old vaccines) in the next 15 years.
OK once again, not remotely how any of these CURRENT drugs work.
Insulin? Sure, I can see that. Great way to kill people with blood sugars, but sure.
Changing METFORMIN to mRNA? LOL fuck outa here. You're reading this wrong. it's a third of NEW drugs. You know what new drugs are being invented currently? Mostly cancer ones. All the -mabs. For those to be made with mRNA is feasible. For the older drugs like lisinopril and metformin? LOL not how it works. Like at all. Like just no.
I don't know why you are putting words into my mouth. I did not say current drugs. I was quoting the article where they explained that 1/3rd of new drugs (and I did not say which ones) over the next 15 years will be mNRA based. If you disagree, that's great, but stop making it sound like Iam the one pitching that.
I see your point, but your general argument is to push for fear of drugs and tbh that's just wrong. I have an intolerance for people pushing for doctors and nurses to be lynched and hype up "omg big pharma". But you're right, you did say NEW drugs. But make it a POINT to say it's NEW then.
I am not anti doctor or medicine. If you re-read the second line, I stated "newly approved drugs in 15 years" .
I suppose I could have written that 1/3rd of all new drugs in the next 15 years will purportedly make use of mRNA technology, with more and more doing so as time progresses, so tomorrow might be 1 new drug, and in 15 years it might be 100 new drugs added, and so by the end of 15 years from now 1/3rd of all new drugs (from today) will be mRNA-based. That is not a run-on sentence, although I admit it is redundant. : )
I get what you mean tho. I have an issue of thinking for people. It's a me thing. Interesting that it shows up online too.