A recent Economist article from its "The World Ahead 2022" issue mentioned that within 15 years all newly approved drugs will be based on mRNA technology. The authors of the article are biogeneticists. I don't have a link... just have the magazine in my lap. Look it up if you need to see it. I am not lying.
Anyway... it got me thinking: accepted vaccines that are mandated (for example, your child needs certain vaccines to attend school outside the home) are a form of control. What if more and more vaccines as well as drugs are mRNA-based?
If I am created in God's image, and mRNA tech changes my DNA, am I choosing to part myself from God if I receive these drugs or vaxxes? If I need a drug to cure a disease that will kill me, but the drug is mRNA based, will I choose to die of the disease, or succumb to the temptation of changing myself in order to live longer?
One could argue that improved vax technology is an outcome of our God-given intellect, and therefore as an advance in medicine.aligned with God's plan.
As for me, I will not be changing my DNA. I wonder how my decision will affect me in the coming years. Will I thus be going against this subtle mark of the beast?
OK once again, not remotely how any of these CURRENT drugs work.
Insulin? Sure, I can see that. Great way to kill people with blood sugars, but sure.
Changing METFORMIN to mRNA? LOL fuck outa here. You're reading this wrong. it's a third of NEW drugs. You know what new drugs are being invented currently? Mostly cancer ones. All the -mabs. For those to be made with mRNA is feasible. For the older drugs like lisinopril and metformin? LOL not how it works. Like at all. Like just no.
I don't know why you are putting words into my mouth. I did not say current drugs. I was quoting the article where they explained that 1/3rd of new drugs (and I did not say which ones) over the next 15 years will be mNRA based. If you disagree, that's great, but stop making it sound like Iam the one pitching that.
I see your point, but your general argument is to push for fear of drugs and tbh that's just wrong. I have an intolerance for people pushing for doctors and nurses to be lynched and hype up "omg big pharma". But you're right, you did say NEW drugs. But make it a POINT to say it's NEW then.
I am not anti doctor or medicine. If you re-read the second line, I stated "newly approved drugs in 15 years" .
I suppose I could have written that 1/3rd of all new drugs in the next 15 years will purportedly make use of mRNA technology, with more and more doing so as time progresses, so tomorrow might be 1 new drug, and in 15 years it might be 100 new drugs added, and so by the end of 15 years from now 1/3rd of all new drugs (from today) will be mRNA-based. That is not a run-on sentence, although I admit it is redundant. : )
I get what you mean tho. I have an issue of thinking for people. It's a me thing. Interesting that it shows up online too.