Just because something "can" be done doesn't mean it "should" be done. But it seems that FAR too many involved in research and development (i.e., scientists, researchers, programmers, marketers, etc.) are so utterly compelled by the challenge and potentIal notoriety/fame/fortune/power of finding out/pushing the limits of what "can" be done that they neglect to consider the wisdom/morality/practicality/potential harm of whether it "should" be done. Instead, they push feverishly on, like demons possesed, to do it and thereby discover or create things (tools, processes, technologies, etc.) which can be (and have been) used for their oppression and, potentially, their (and humanity's) ultimate demise.
Just because something "can" be done doesn't mean it "should" be done. But it seems that FAR too many involved in research and development (i.e., scientists, researchers, programmers, marketers, etc.) are so utterly compelled by the challenge and potentIal notoriety/fame/fortune/power of finding out/pushing the limits of what "can" be done that they neglect to consider the wisdom/morality/practicality/potential harm of whether it "should" be done. Instead, they push feverishly on, like demons possesed, to do it and thereby discover or create things (tools, processes, technologies, etc.) which can be (and have been) used for their oppression and, potentially, their (and humanity's) ultimate demise.