“Can you point to the source I stole my analysis of the primer report on?”
“Here’s a link to a search engine that probably has it somewhere but I won’t look.”
And,
“The MSM didn’t carry the story of Trump’s visit to the Forbidden City.”
“Yes, they did. Five seconds shows multiple MSM stories covering it.”
“We’ll, they didn’t cover the signficance.”
“Here is the entire first paragraph from CNN stating the significance.”
“You’re a sheep.”
Being wrong doesn’t even slow you down. Does it even register? Are you able to admit when a point you made has been defeated?
I can and have. But you? The possibility that you’re wrong doesn’t even make it past your ears.
I address Q posts specifically on occasion, as I did yesterday. I just chose the first proof presented.
I’ve already told you I’m not turning this account into a debunking account to debate prophecies when future proves past and Q might be talking in non-linear time and disinformation is necessary.
That makes arguing specific interpretations of Q posts a waste of time. Interpretations have changed and will continue to change as time marches forward.
I’ve explained why. I do not respect you more than the mods here. And losing respect for you does not mean I lose respect for this movement.
As I said, I don’t exist to serve you, and luckily, Q knows me and my work far better than you do. If Q is who he claims to be, I’m satisfied he’d be amused at comparing our positions in this conversation.
And that’s all without me taking an hour out of my day to humor you every single time you ask. As I have done countless times now.
Including for Q posts, but your memory has apparently not been reliable.
Ha.
I guess your research into this topic didn’t extend to yesterday.
You’re incredible.
“You’ve never analyzed a real Q proof.”
“I did yesterday.”
“We’ll, you didn’t do this specific one.”
And,
“You don’t do your own research.”
“Can you point to the source I stole my analysis of the primer report on?”
“Here’s a link to a search engine that probably has it somewhere but I won’t look.”
And,
“The MSM didn’t carry the story of Trump’s visit to the Forbidden City.”
“Yes, they did. Five seconds shows multiple MSM stories covering it.”
“We’ll, they didn’t cover the signficance.”
“Here is the entire first paragraph from CNN stating the significance.”
“You’re a sheep.”
Being wrong doesn’t even slow you down. Does it even register? Are you able to admit when a point you made has been defeated?
I can and have. But you? The possibility that you’re wrong doesn’t even make it past your ears.
I address Q posts specifically on occasion, as I did yesterday. I just chose the first proof presented.
I’ve already told you I’m not turning this account into a debunking account to debate prophecies when future proves past and Q might be talking in non-linear time and disinformation is necessary.
That makes arguing specific interpretations of Q posts a waste of time. Interpretations have changed and will continue to change as time marches forward.
I’ve explained why. I do not respect you more than the mods here. And losing respect for you does not mean I lose respect for this movement.
It just means losing respect for you.
You know what?
Fine.
Create a topic and I’ll run through it. Make it loud and bright.
I don’t get paid to be here.
I spent a while on a Q proof yesterday, one I remember seeing Q post live.
https://greatawakening.win/p/142B0wDBGj/x/c/4OUhvkKISno?d=50
As I said, I don’t exist to serve you, and luckily, Q knows me and my work far better than you do. If Q is who he claims to be, I’m satisfied he’d be amused at comparing our positions in this conversation.
And that’s all without me taking an hour out of my day to humor you every single time you ask. As I have done countless times now.
Including for Q posts, but your memory has apparently not been reliable.
And that’s good enough for me.