Of course it is relevant who is running with it after it has been doubted without resolution.
And no, it is irrelevant whether I have posted it or not, although I have investigated and commented on it. Where is your investigation? Or did you feel that using Hall Turner' s running as credible enough?
Jesus! This is two years old. And we already found it unsatisfying back then.
Now Hal Turner is .... running with it?
who gives a fuck " whos running with it,..Did you post it 2 yrs ago,?
Of course it is relevant who is running with it after it has been doubted without resolution.
And no, it is irrelevant whether I have posted it or not, although I have investigated and commented on it. Where is your investigation? Or did you feel that using Hall Turner' s running as credible enough?
if its old to you keep scrolling,..!
Why? Because overwhelming new data has come out. This is regurgitating old doubted data.