Look up Gabbard's positions. She was in favor of the Green New Deal but withdrew her support because the legislation was too vague over nuclear waste. But, she is clear about wanting to move into renewable energy and off fossil fuels. In September 2017 she introduced the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act ("OFF Act"). Tulsi advocates for universal basic income and free college. She is in favor of paying for the college tuition by a tax on trading stocks and bonds. The NRA gave Gabbard an F-rating because she supports additional restrictions to gun ownership and would love nothing better than to take away most people's right to have firearms. She supports universal single payer health care. When addressing housing issues she speaks in the universal globalist language of public-private partnerships. So, even though Ms Tulsi has some views that differ from the mainstream of her party's talking points, at the core she still holds some really basic globalist views that fit well within the WEF Great Reset.
As far as Putin is concerned, I have family history in Russia and have contacts in both Ukraine and Russia. My opinions are based upon knowledge of the country and its history and not from some narrative pushed by either side. The world is not clearly defined into good guys and bad guys. It is not that simple. Being in agreement over one issue, like being against the NWO, does not suddenly negate all the rest of the crap in the trunk. Putin is no one to mess with. With a little research you can find out about all the journalists that he has had wacked over the years. The rest, you can do your own homework. I've done mine.
I was aware of (most) of what you just listed about Tulsi. But why does that make her a Satanist and not just a libtard we can disagree with? That was my main point.
I did not say she was a Satanist. I have no way of knowing that. But, I do know she is a globalist in the mold of the WEF and because of that, she needs to be held at arms length even though she makes a few good points. That is all I was trying to say.
You know what I think YOU'RE a globalist. You havent provided any evidence at all. This is all opinionated conjecture.
Look up Gabbard's positions. She was in favor of the Green New Deal but withdrew her support because the legislation was too vague over nuclear waste. But, she is clear about wanting to move into renewable energy and off fossil fuels. In September 2017 she introduced the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act ("OFF Act"). Tulsi advocates for universal basic income and free college. She is in favor of paying for the college tuition by a tax on trading stocks and bonds. The NRA gave Gabbard an F-rating because she supports additional restrictions to gun ownership and would love nothing better than to take away most people's right to have firearms. She supports universal single payer health care. When addressing housing issues she speaks in the universal globalist language of public-private partnerships. So, even though Ms Tulsi has some views that differ from the mainstream of her party's talking points, at the core she still holds some really basic globalist views that fit well within the WEF Great Reset.
As far as Putin is concerned, I have family history in Russia and have contacts in both Ukraine and Russia. My opinions are based upon knowledge of the country and its history and not from some narrative pushed by either side. The world is not clearly defined into good guys and bad guys. It is not that simple. Being in agreement over one issue, like being against the NWO, does not suddenly negate all the rest of the crap in the trunk. Putin is no one to mess with. With a little research you can find out about all the journalists that he has had wacked over the years. The rest, you can do your own homework. I've done mine.
I was aware of (most) of what you just listed about Tulsi. But why does that make her a Satanist and not just a libtard we can disagree with? That was my main point.
I did not say she was a Satanist. I have no way of knowing that. But, I do know she is a globalist in the mold of the WEF and because of that, she needs to be held at arms length even though she makes a few good points. That is all I was trying to say.
Well fair enough. I don't disagree with that.