I said it was potentially a photoshop. I rarely claim absolute knowledge of anything.
The last time I tried to source that was in 2009, so I’m glad something came up in the meantime. You provided the source.
I analyzed it. Which is what you do when provided the source. I found it to be lacking, asked you to explain why you found the evidence to he convincing despite its objective problems, and received no clarification.
The mere fact that a source exists is step 1 in verifying a source. Please don’t get pissy that successfully fulfilling step 1 of demonstrating the validity of your claim is not enough to convince me of it’s credibility after I proceed to step 2.
I said it was potentially a photoshop. I rarely claim absolute knowledge of anything.
The last time I tried to source that was in 2009, so I’m glad something came up in the meantime. You provided the source.
I analyzed it. Which is what you do when provided the source. I found it to be lacking, asked you to explain why you found the evidence to he convincing despite its objective problems, and received no clarification.
The mere fact that a source exists is step 1 in verifying a source. Please don’t get pissy that successfully fulfilling step 1 of demonstrating the validity of your claim is not enough to convince me of it’s credibility after I proceed to step 2.