Isn't this useless information unless we know how many people were vaccinated? If 20% are unvaxxinated but still account for 20% of deaths, then wouldn't that just mean the vaccine is neutral and not effective?
AT BEST. Precisely. Which would void all rationale for mandates and digital passport which is mostly what we are fighting against. We don't necessarily have to prove the vaccinated are dying en masses.
(Even though they are exhibiting increased rates of cancers and autoimmune disorders, etc... )
You're right about it killing the justification for the mandates, but they've got another insidious way to coerce you though. They'll claim their data shows less risk of hospitalization and death to the vaccinated, so they could change their Medicare and Medicaid rules to not reimburse any Covid related medical treatment and allow private insurers to do the same or to allow raised premiums on the un-vaccinated.
Vaccine coverage tells us about the proportion of the population that have received one, 2 and 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines. By 6 March 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was 69.5% and for dose 2 was 65.0%. Overall vaccine uptake in England in people with at least 3 doses was 50.5%. In line with the programme rollout, coverage is highest in the oldest age groups.
Vaccine coverage tells us about the proportion of the population that have received one, 2 and 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines. By 6 March 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was 69.5% and for dose 2 was 65.0%. Overall vaccine uptake in England in people with at least 3 doses was 50.5%. In line with the programme rollout, coverage is highest in the oldest age groups.
Considering the vaccines were supposed to protect people from hospitalization and death, you would expect 80%+ of the deaths to be among the unvaccinated.
That these numbers look like even distributions given the inferred vaccination rates shows the vaccines aren’t doing shit except causing clots and strokes for zero benefit.
Isn't this useless information unless we know how many people were vaccinated? If 20% are unvaxxinated but still account for 20% of deaths, then wouldn't that just mean the vaccine is neutral and not effective?
AT BEST. Precisely. Which would void all rationale for mandates and digital passport which is mostly what we are fighting against. We don't necessarily have to prove the vaccinated are dying en masses.
(Even though they are exhibiting increased rates of cancers and autoimmune disorders, etc... )
You're right about it killing the justification for the mandates, but they've got another insidious way to coerce you though. They'll claim their data shows less risk of hospitalization and death to the vaccinated, so they could change their Medicare and Medicaid rules to not reimburse any Covid related medical treatment and allow private insurers to do the same or to allow raised premiums on the un-vaccinated.
I'm fairly certain that they're not over 90% jabbed.
Thats a quote from the same report. Link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1060030/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-10.pdf
Thats a quote from the same report. Link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1060030/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-10.pdf
Considering the vaccines were supposed to protect people from hospitalization and death, you would expect 80%+ of the deaths to be among the unvaccinated.
That these numbers look like even distributions given the inferred vaccination rates shows the vaccines aren’t doing shit except causing clots and strokes for zero benefit.