Things getting wild - Peter Daszak (of Wuhan Funding infamy) is a son of an alleged Ukrainian Nazi collaborator !
(pete843.substack.com)
Langley AGAIN
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (73)
sorted by:
I think most of the disconnect in the conversation is over what 'Nazi' beliefs are. Almost certainly, Soros did not believe in Deutschland Uber Alles. He certainly doesn't believe in the superiority of the Aryan race. I think those are integral to what the Third Reich was all about. You may disagree with me.
What I think Soros does believe in, is the strategy and tactics of political change. The SA in Germany used tactics which they had seen work in previous Communist-driven revolutions, the same tactics which Antifa uses today. That doesn't mean Antifa has Nazi beliefs.
If you want to say that Antifa uses thuggish behavior, and call that Nazi behavior, then it's because you have formed that association in your mind that Nazi=thuggish.
My contention is that NSDAP's movement and ideals in Germany were separate from the tactics they employed to rise to power.
Far too many people are intellectually lazy enough to allow the Nazi epithet to be a catchall for anything negative that a political organization does.
If you want to say that eugenicists are plotting in the Deep State, that may be true. If you say they have plans to implement a totalitarian government, that might also be true. But where it gets murky is when you choose to connect them to a political movement from last century and ignore the fact that they eschew most of the major beliefs of that political movement.
At the same time far too many people are intellectually lazy enough to allow the Nazi epithet to stand for only positive stuff.
You have to realise that NSDAP was the outcome of a "Problem-Reaction-Solution" technique. Yes, a lot of people who joined it were attracted by the ideals. I have no quarrel with these people. But it was also infiltrated by some really evil people. And these are the people who survived and thrived post WW2 and formed the backbone of the current day deep state.
So for you, Nazi symbolises those people who were in it for those ideals. For me the word Nazi symbolises those who survived and thrived.
Ultimately, my point is that you have to look beyond the labels to be able to navigate any landscape created by the Cabal. If you get stuck with the labels and the emotions that goes with it, you will not be able to see the reality properly.
Just to give a simple example - a lot of people joined Antifa because they genuinely thought they were fighting against authoritarians. However when someone says Antifa - I am not going to think of them. I think of those who intended to cause chaos in the society and used others as tools for that.
In this example "fighting against authoritarians" is an illusion, a mirage created by the Cabal.
Now we are getting somewhere!
Looking beyond the labels is my point exactly. You say Nazi and the image conjured up is Hitler shouting in harsh German, red Swastika banners waving, soldiers goose-stepping, bombs dropping, and starving prisoners in concentration camps. This is all the end result of decades of propaganda. And when you use the Nazi label, you must realize you are attaching all that to whomever you are accusing. Who can blame Antifa if that's what they believe they are fighting?
The reality is, the crimes stand on their own, and they should be punished on their own, for their own culpability - not the association with the Nazi Ogre.
And we know the Cabal uses the Nazi Ogre all the time. If you're using it to make a point - what's good for the goose is good for the gander - then I understand it. It's just not what I would choose.