Look at her stock trading history. Bought $15k or something like that in defense.industry stocks BEFORE Russia went into Ukraine. She is paying herself.
Not sure if she has always been controlled Op. or if they just added her to their team or if she is trying to play both sides.
First and foremost, I don’t think elected officials should be able to trade. That being said, 15k is closer to zero than real money and we shouldn’t be distracted by what is essentially to those people, chump change. I for one am still trying to separate the signal from the noise
personally don't buy defense stocks, but $15k on defense stocks was a no brainer. possibility of war was headline news for a month before the invasion.
i support a ban on trading for elected leaders, but the way you worded your first post with 'BEFORE' in all caps implied that she must have had foreknowledge which was what i was responding to.
Look at her stock trading history. Bought $15k or something like that in defense.industry stocks BEFORE Russia went into Ukraine. She is paying herself.
Not sure if she has always been controlled Op. or if they just added her to their team or if she is trying to play both sides.
First and foremost, I don’t think elected officials should be able to trade. That being said, 15k is closer to zero than real money and we shouldn’t be distracted by what is essentially to those people, chump change. I for one am still trying to separate the signal from the noise
personally don't buy defense stocks, but $15k on defense stocks was a no brainer. possibility of war was headline news for a month before the invasion.
I look at the fact that she can influence policy directly resulting in her.making more money.
She is profiting from her position. That is why I think she is taking the stance she is taking.
i support a ban on trading for elected leaders, but the way you worded your first post with 'BEFORE' in all caps implied that she must have had foreknowledge which was what i was responding to.