That's why I love GAW, it's the best forum I've ever found aligned with my way of thinking. We can agree and disagree, debate and use dialectic.
With MTG, one of the main things I'm impressed with is that she's gone public about how bills were being passed in congress with a minimal number of senators present, without them being read, and taking a verbal 'yay' or 'nay' count. She's been in there since insisting that bills get read in full and that the votes are recorded. So whatever her intentions are, at least she's done that for due process' sake.
I agree man! I find that rational discussion and debate is great fuel for gaining better and more well-rounded knowledge.
That's why I love GAW, it's the best forum I've ever found aligned with my way of thinking. We can agree and disagree, debate and use dialectic.
With MTG, one of the main things I'm impressed with is that she's gone public about how bills were being passed in congress with a minimal number of senators present, without them being read, and taking a verbal 'yay' or 'nay' count. She's been in there since insisting that bills get read in full and that the votes are recorded. So whatever her intentions are, at least she's done that for due process' sake.