I did a lot of research on this when it happened and a military explosion expert said it was rigged from the inside according to the pictures of the blast evidence. A truck bomb couldn’t have collapsed it in that way. One of the interior supports was taken out.
I’ll see if I can get to my old research file and post the pictures an article from the new American.
Yup, without correct direction of the explosion its energy takes the path of least resistance - the fucking air - towards other buildings that suffered little damage.
Edit: This basic fact is the same as the basic fact that a fundamentally hollow and weak aluminum plane cannot pierce like a tank sabot round through thick concrete/steel outer building skeleton, so no matter who did it it the official story is obvious crap.
Yes it was written, as I recall, the force is inversely proportional as the distance increases. So the truck bomb couldn’t have been the main damaging blast to collapse the column in the middle of the building.
I did a lot of research on this when it happened and a military explosion expert said it was rigged from the inside according to the pictures of the blast evidence. A truck bomb couldn’t have collapsed it in that way. One of the interior supports was taken out. I’ll see if I can get to my old research file and post the pictures an article from the new American.
Yup, without correct direction of the explosion its energy takes the path of least resistance - the fucking air - towards other buildings that suffered little damage.
Edit: This basic fact is the same as the basic fact that a fundamentally hollow and weak aluminum plane cannot pierce like a tank sabot round through thick concrete/steel outer building skeleton, so no matter who did it it the official story is obvious crap.
Yes it was written, as I recall, the force is inversely proportional as the distance increases. So the truck bomb couldn’t have been the main damaging blast to collapse the column in the middle of the building.
Ah interesting. This part makes sense too.