If someone with terminal cancer were to release it all what are they going to do about it? Charge that person with a crime and thereby admit it's real and get it introduced in Court proceedings? That sounds like a pretty ideal outcome to me.
I'll be honest, I don't trust people who hold information back. It makes me distrust what they actually have. It makes me distrust them.
I have no idea if he really has the sauce he says he does or not but the general public does not need to open up hunters laptop and have possibly hundreds of underage girls with no clothes on them, having unspeakable things done to them, shoved in their face. Unedited. I have no desire to see that. Not to mention the laws that will land you in prison for putting it out there like that. If that is indeed what he has.
I disagree, the people who don't think this happens or don't think there are really victims of those kinds of crimes NEEDS to see it and it needs to shake the indifference out of them and fill them with fury for the people that did it and the people that allowed it. In order to fight monsters you actually have to believe they exist and understand what form they take. They need to know evil exists because that will draw them towards the only protection there is.
You are allowed to disagree, but it can also be described and/or body parts edited out/ faces/identities edited out. This kind of stuff is not fit for human consumption IMHO.
Sorry, I had a guy at work awhile ago describing bizarre porn he had watched in front of a crowd at work and I called him on it. Told him it was not fit for public conversation. He shut up and hasn't since.
This stuff is not fit for public.
We all get what is being done by these people without needing to watch the stuff.
Maybe "we" all here get it, but I guarantee you there are plenty of 65 year old teachers that are lifelong Democrats that don't believe this is real. They're utterly brainwashed.
Sometimes I think it's best to not release everything at once. Remember the East Anglia climate gate stuff? I think they released some stuff, but not all. Then they let the media try to spin/debunk it. Then they released more which might have, can't remember, added more validity to what they originally released thus making the media and talking heads look stupid. I think it's a typical tactic people use and it seems to work well.
Which might be a good argument if they understood what they all have, but from the sounds of it there is just so much data it is taking them a long time to sift through it. And nothing assists with determining what you have like turning thousands of autists against it. The memory of the collective is unparalleled and will locate connections far faster than some small team hunting and pecking through massive document caches searching for keywords or however they're looking now.
The tempo of this war is deliberate and precise. Due to the embedded nature of our enemy, the pace at which 'ammo' is dispensed is done with purpose for a number of reasons. Action/ Reaction. This slow drip of emails from Maxey is on par with fueling up ICBMs and nuclear subs coming to launch depth because it deals directly with bioweapons of mass destruction. The cabal is responding appropriately and in doing so, exposing more embedded assets that can now be targeted and neutralized. Literally just like chess.
Specifically what assets have been neutralized? What makes you think the same embedded Deep State that put them in those roles in the first place hasn't simply replaced them using the same methods?
If someone with terminal cancer were to release it all what are they going to do about it? Charge that person with a crime and thereby admit it's real and get it introduced in Court proceedings? That sounds like a pretty ideal outcome to me.
I'll be honest, I don't trust people who hold information back. It makes me distrust what they actually have. It makes me distrust them.
I have no idea if he really has the sauce he says he does or not but the general public does not need to open up hunters laptop and have possibly hundreds of underage girls with no clothes on them, having unspeakable things done to them, shoved in their face. Unedited. I have no desire to see that. Not to mention the laws that will land you in prison for putting it out there like that. If that is indeed what he has.
I disagree, the people who don't think this happens or don't think there are really victims of those kinds of crimes NEEDS to see it and it needs to shake the indifference out of them and fill them with fury for the people that did it and the people that allowed it. In order to fight monsters you actually have to believe they exist and understand what form they take. They need to know evil exists because that will draw them towards the only protection there is.
You are allowed to disagree, but it can also be described and/or body parts edited out/ faces/identities edited out. This kind of stuff is not fit for human consumption IMHO.
Sorry, I had a guy at work awhile ago describing bizarre porn he had watched in front of a crowd at work and I called him on it. Told him it was not fit for public conversation. He shut up and hasn't since.
This stuff is not fit for public. We all get what is being done by these people without needing to watch the stuff.
Maybe "we" all here get it, but I guarantee you there are plenty of 65 year old teachers that are lifelong Democrats that don't believe this is real. They're utterly brainwashed.
Sometimes I think it's best to not release everything at once. Remember the East Anglia climate gate stuff? I think they released some stuff, but not all. Then they let the media try to spin/debunk it. Then they released more which might have, can't remember, added more validity to what they originally released thus making the media and talking heads look stupid. I think it's a typical tactic people use and it seems to work well.
Which might be a good argument if they understood what they all have, but from the sounds of it there is just so much data it is taking them a long time to sift through it. And nothing assists with determining what you have like turning thousands of autists against it. The memory of the collective is unparalleled and will locate connections far faster than some small team hunting and pecking through massive document caches searching for keywords or however they're looking now.
The tempo of this war is deliberate and precise. Due to the embedded nature of our enemy, the pace at which 'ammo' is dispensed is done with purpose for a number of reasons. Action/ Reaction. This slow drip of emails from Maxey is on par with fueling up ICBMs and nuclear subs coming to launch depth because it deals directly with bioweapons of mass destruction. The cabal is responding appropriately and in doing so, exposing more embedded assets that can now be targeted and neutralized. Literally just like chess.
Specifically what assets have been neutralized? What makes you think the same embedded Deep State that put them in those roles in the first place hasn't simply replaced them using the same methods?