Just to have the most obvious explanation on record here, many lawyers will fuck around with their spellcheck over time, as legal language will throw off regular checkers. It’s possible this wasn’t the word that was intended, but also one that either got auto-corrected by a lawyerly spell-checker or was not recognized as a misspelled word when being checked.
Besides annoying the judge a bit, I doubt using “fictious” instead of “fictitious” is going to be a death-blow to Trump’s case. Misspellings tend to be bad when they allow ambiguity, but I don't think anyone is confused about what the intended word was supposed to be here.
Do you know how the Khazarian Mafia rose to power? It was by not making mistakes on the world stage.
Just because the Khazarian Mafia rose to power "by not making mistakes," it doesn't mean that someone else can't. Boris Yeltsin was known for being drunk on the world stage; was he "not making mistakes"? Considering how unpopular he was, it didn't seem like it.
The point I'm making is that the world is run by human beings. And human beings are not infallible. We grow by learning from our errors, and that includes world leaders.
Can I ask how absolutely you believe that? I am certain it’s not “perfectly incapable of making mistakes”, because that’s a trait reserved for religious figures.
So is it that Trump wouldn’t make a mistake, ever, in any capacity?
Is it that Trump would personally review every piece of writing sent on his behalf and would never have permitted this to go forward if it was a mistake?
We have reason to believe that Donald Trump proofreading a legal document would identify “fictious” as incorrect in a large, complex legal document? The man is a perfect proofreader?
Is it that Trump has never been shown to make a mistake in hiring anyone, so every single person involved in the creation of this document is also infallible?
It just seems like a cop-out to say, “Trump doesn’t make mistakes and therefore you’re wrong.” Surely he has to make SOME mistake in SOME capacity, somewhere.
If he isn’t a perfect speller, or if he doesn’t personally review every word sent on his behalf, or if the people who work for him are capable of making mistakes, then all those possibilities would lead to the potential that this was a mistake, right?
How can you differentiate “fake mistakes” from the real ones that literally every non-divine human makes?
Just to have the most obvious explanation on record here, many lawyers will fuck around with their spellcheck over time, as legal language will throw off regular checkers. It’s possible this wasn’t the word that was intended, but also one that either got auto-corrected by a lawyerly spell-checker or was not recognized as a misspelled word when being checked.
Besides annoying the judge a bit, I doubt using “fictious” instead of “fictitious” is going to be a death-blow to Trump’s case. Misspellings tend to be bad when they allow ambiguity, but I don't think anyone is confused about what the intended word was supposed to be here.
Trump doesn’t make mistakes, period. There is no way he would allow his lawyers to either. This was intentional.
Show me a human being incapable of making mistakes and I'll show you a liar. Everyone makes mistakes, it's human nature.
Just because the Khazarian Mafia rose to power "by not making mistakes," it doesn't mean that someone else can't. Boris Yeltsin was known for being drunk on the world stage; was he "not making mistakes"? Considering how unpopular he was, it didn't seem like it.
The point I'm making is that the world is run by human beings. And human beings are not infallible. We grow by learning from our errors, and that includes world leaders.
Can I ask how absolutely you believe that? I am certain it’s not “perfectly incapable of making mistakes”, because that’s a trait reserved for religious figures.
So is it that Trump wouldn’t make a mistake, ever, in any capacity?
Is it that Trump would personally review every piece of writing sent on his behalf and would never have permitted this to go forward if it was a mistake?
We have reason to believe that Donald Trump proofreading a legal document would identify “fictious” as incorrect in a large, complex legal document? The man is a perfect proofreader?
Is it that Trump has never been shown to make a mistake in hiring anyone, so every single person involved in the creation of this document is also infallible?
It just seems like a cop-out to say, “Trump doesn’t make mistakes and therefore you’re wrong.” Surely he has to make SOME mistake in SOME capacity, somewhere.
If he isn’t a perfect speller, or if he doesn’t personally review every word sent on his behalf, or if the people who work for him are capable of making mistakes, then all those possibilities would lead to the potential that this was a mistake, right?
How can you differentiate “fake mistakes” from the real ones that literally every non-divine human makes?