When we're all rounded up, sent off to FEMA camp, and eventually killed. I think that would falsify it for me. Anything less drastic becomes problematic because my belief system has been reduced to things I can personally prove, disprove, or measure. Everything else is questionable.
So Q has not been disproven, and the "Q proofs" lend it significant credibility, and it's a constant source of hopium, which is better than nothing in these difficult times. I'll take it, for lack of a better choice.
It's like asking your baseball team if they should cut a player with a .400 batting average. Does he suck because he fails most of the time at the plate, or is he an all-star because he has more hits than anyone else?
When Q says a false flag involving Bangladesh and "fireworks" will happen next week, and then some guy from Bangladesh tries to bomb the NY subway, we're no longer dealing in theories.
Q being a theory was your assumption, not mine. My statement: "...We're no longer dealing in theories."
My assertion is based on the certainty that Q had access to high level intelligence resources. If he did not, then the remaining possibility is that Q was an elaborate hoax that had participation from leftwing media, DC bureaucrats, and Trump. Q provided unique data points from all three at different times.
I used to be a huge Q critic myself. Then in 2021 I had to acknowledge he was right.
I also starting studying Q after the 2020 steal. But I actually studied the posts closely, and my jaw still drops when I discover how accurate he was.
If you didn't see the same accuracy, then you didn't put in the effort.
Here's one.
When we're all rounded up, sent off to FEMA camp, and eventually killed. I think that would falsify it for me. Anything less drastic becomes problematic because my belief system has been reduced to things I can personally prove, disprove, or measure. Everything else is questionable.
So Q has not been disproven, and the "Q proofs" lend it significant credibility, and it's a constant source of hopium, which is better than nothing in these difficult times. I'll take it, for lack of a better choice.
It's like asking your baseball team if they should cut a player with a .400 batting average. Does he suck because he fails most of the time at the plate, or is he an all-star because he has more hits than anyone else?
When Q says a false flag involving Bangladesh and "fireworks" will happen next week, and then some guy from Bangladesh tries to bomb the NY subway, we're no longer dealing in theories.
Q being a theory was your assumption, not mine. My statement: "...We're no longer dealing in theories."
My assertion is based on the certainty that Q had access to high level intelligence resources. If he did not, then the remaining possibility is that Q was an elaborate hoax that had participation from leftwing media, DC bureaucrats, and Trump. Q provided unique data points from all three at different times.
I used to be a huge Q critic myself. Then in 2021 I had to acknowledge he was right.