In the middle of a month long war I find it odd that the Russians would rush to inform the families of the dead soldiers, and further, tell them to not talk about it to anyone, which they did ( how many did?). How many families have access to reporters or media to tell of the death of the soldier knowing full well they were ordered to not tell. A Russian soldier is killed, identified, his squad leader is notified, he then notifies his higher up of the death, then that guy notifies someone who registers the names of the dead soldier, then someone is sent out to notify the family.So many hoops to go through and in one month, pretty darn efficient.
I’m not sure you’re understanding the article if this is redpill material. Or maybe I’m not.
The article reports that the families of Russian soldiers who are killed in Ukraine are being ordered by Russia not to talk about it. Apparently, they are trying to hide exactly how many Russian soldiers are getting killed in Ukraine, and they’re pressuring their own citizens to help by having them keep quiet.
A Russian journalist says families of soldiers killed in Ukraine are being told to keep silent about it, and that newspapers are told not to report fatalities.
"All local media outlets were instructed by regional government not to publish any data on losses in Ukraine," the journalist, who works in the Siberia region, told BBC World correspondent Olga Ivshina.
What part of this story is considered a surprising redpill to you? It appears to be a story discussing Russia taking fairly grotesque steps to make it look like they’re succeeding more in a war than they are. It doesn’t appear to be a very pro-Russia or pro-Plan story.
My statement evaluates the source, Zeitreise. The source posted by the OP suggesting it is a redpill. It does not appear to be a redpill.
If I have to assume the source is lying 100% in order to be redpilled, it’s not a redpill.
That’s the only point I made here. Any argument you’re trying to have about the truthfulness of the reporting has nothing to do with my point whatsoever.
So you’re suggesting that the OP was correct, and this is on the basis that most normies are adopting your strategy of assuming the truth of reality is always 100% the opposite of what the news says.
Can you show me where you’re seeing this mass awakening of normies? Or are you just assuming that they must be seeing what you believe to be obvious?
This is why I am surprised they are reporting this.
Apparently not well enough lol
In the middle of a month long war I find it odd that the Russians would rush to inform the families of the dead soldiers, and further, tell them to not talk about it to anyone, which they did ( how many did?). How many families have access to reporters or media to tell of the death of the soldier knowing full well they were ordered to not tell. A Russian soldier is killed, identified, his squad leader is notified, he then notifies his higher up of the death, then that guy notifies someone who registers the names of the dead soldier, then someone is sent out to notify the family.So many hoops to go through and in one month, pretty darn efficient.
I’m not sure you’re understanding the article if this is redpill material. Or maybe I’m not.
The article reports that the families of Russian soldiers who are killed in Ukraine are being ordered by Russia not to talk about it. Apparently, they are trying to hide exactly how many Russian soldiers are getting killed in Ukraine, and they’re pressuring their own citizens to help by having them keep quiet.
What part of this story is considered a surprising redpill to you? It appears to be a story discussing Russia taking fairly grotesque steps to make it look like they’re succeeding more in a war than they are. It doesn’t appear to be a very pro-Russia or pro-Plan story.
You are right. I misread the article, its just plain old fake news.
My statement evaluates the source, Zeitreise. The source posted by the OP suggesting it is a redpill. It does not appear to be a redpill.
If I have to assume the source is lying 100% in order to be redpilled, it’s not a redpill.
That’s the only point I made here. Any argument you’re trying to have about the truthfulness of the reporting has nothing to do with my point whatsoever.
It’s worth picking some battles, friend.
So you’re suggesting that the OP was correct, and this is on the basis that most normies are adopting your strategy of assuming the truth of reality is always 100% the opposite of what the news says.
Can you show me where you’re seeing this mass awakening of normies? Or are you just assuming that they must be seeing what you believe to be obvious?
Yeah, there is more to the story as always with fake news reporting, but I was wrong about this being redpill material.