My statement evaluates the source, Zeitreise. The source posted by the OP suggesting it is a redpill. It does not appear to be a redpill.
If I have to assume the source is lying 100% in order to be redpilled, it’s not a redpill.
That’s the only point I made here. Any argument you’re trying to have about the truthfulness of the reporting has nothing to do with my point whatsoever.
So you’re suggesting that the OP was correct, and this is on the basis that most normies are adopting your strategy of assuming the truth of reality is always 100% the opposite of what the news says.
Can you show me where you’re seeing this mass awakening of normies? Or are you just assuming that they must be seeing what you believe to be obvious?
My statement evaluates the source, Zeitreise. The source posted by the OP suggesting it is a redpill. It does not appear to be a redpill.
If I have to assume the source is lying 100% in order to be redpilled, it’s not a redpill.
That’s the only point I made here. Any argument you’re trying to have about the truthfulness of the reporting has nothing to do with my point whatsoever.
It’s worth picking some battles, friend.
So you’re suggesting that the OP was correct, and this is on the basis that most normies are adopting your strategy of assuming the truth of reality is always 100% the opposite of what the news says.
Can you show me where you’re seeing this mass awakening of normies? Or are you just assuming that they must be seeing what you believe to be obvious?