This is actually worse than allowing abortions as it opens the door for anyone to dispatch a newly born child, not just its mother and doctor. They have outdone themselves.
Could the state start murdering newly born children on a whim now? Of course they will initially use excuses, such as they were terminally ill so we just sped up the inevitable. However, like with euthanasia, it will evolve to the point where they will be singing the slogan: It's body, my choice.
Also, they keep claiming that there is a so-called "slippery slope fallacy". Yet, I have never seen it fail. It looks more like a law to me. The started with gay marriage and claimed it was their own choice and none of our business. Then they started suing and trying to destroy the lives of anyone who didn't want to make them a cake for their wedding. It sounds like they wanted to make it our business. Same thing with euthanasia. In Europe, they are now allowing young, physically healthy people to end their lives through euthanasia. Obviously they are not mentally healthy otherwise they would not be trying to do that, but instead of help, they offer them the final solution. It used to be "My body, my Choice!". Not that that slogan ever made sense, but now it's morphed into "It's body, my choice!". If anyone here has an example of where the slippery slop argument has actually failed, I'd like to hear about it. It very much seems that every time they called "The Slippery Slope" a fallacy, it turned out to be true and often in ways we didn't even imagine.
This is actually worse than allowing abortions as it opens the door for anyone to dispatch a newly born child, not just its mother and doctor. They have outdone themselves.
Could the state start murdering newly born children on a whim now? Of course they will initially use excuses, such as they were terminally ill so we just sped up the inevitable. However, like with euthanasia, it will evolve to the point where they will be singing the slogan: It's body, my choice.
Also, they keep claiming that there is a so-called "slippery slope fallacy". Yet, I have never seen it fail. It looks more like a law to me. The started with gay marriage and claimed it was their own choice and none of our business. Then they started suing and trying to destroy the lives of anyone who didn't want to make them a cake for their wedding. It sounds like they wanted to make it our business. Same thing with euthanasia. In Europe, they are now allowing young, physically healthy people to end their lives through euthanasia. Obviously they are not mentally healthy otherwise they would not be trying to do that, but instead of help, they offer them the final solution. It used to be "My body, my Choice!". Not that that slogan ever made sense, but now it's morphed into "It's body, my choice!". If anyone here has an example of where the slippery slop argument has actually failed, I'd like to hear about it. It very much seems that every time they called "The Slippery Slope" a fallacy, it turned out to be true and often in ways we didn't even imagine.