I'm wondering, since the horse that won was red (representing the republicans), could this be about the Fall primaries? Are the dems realizing that they're going to get pummeled?
On the flip side of this, could it mean the exact opposite -- that the Dems have something up their sleeve to steal another election?? The 1 in 80 chance?
No, I think the Rich Strike is good news for our side.
The traditional string-pullers wouldn't be cast as the underdog. It also wouldn't depict a horse decked in Republican red that wins bigly in a shocking come from behind victory that no one saw coming if it were for the blue democrats.
If the dems could just "cheat" (which they've never been that successful at for midterms as mid term red waves often prove) their way to victory there were would be no stunning upset. It would already be over if it were that easy.
Q posts already talked about that NSA made it impossible for dems to win by electronic cheating. That is why they needed the pandemic in 2020.
Reference Q post #4688
Create non_digital pathway to rig 2020 Presidential election _engage 80 million mail-in-ballot distribution [coordinated as early as April/May] to sidestep election night defeat [no 'concede'] attempt ballot harvest media push 'we don't know how many ballots are left undelivered by postal service' re: legal challenge battleground states _stall_challenge_push division/chaos _CLAS1-99
That is why they couldn't steal the senate in 2018 like they wanted. Q talks about the NSA had already removed that power. They couldn't cheat by electronics anymore. It wouldn't be enough. Paper ballots were the only way and flagrant cheating.
Now that is also being systematically removed in many states. Paper ballots have been neutered in Texas and others states. Many former cheaters did not get the rewards they thought they would. Many are getting prosecuted (like the one who was caught in that undercover video bragging about her cheating in Texas).
A lot of city voting has moved into giant stadiums were there are cameras. The cheaters were made very aware of that in 2020 and will be nervous of those stadium cameras. Centralizing makes things easier to monitor. If you want more cheating you decentralize.
Plus polling would be lopsided and pushing for a "blue wave" when there is none. The blue wave narrative was just how much they planned to cheat by.
Polling at this point is usually just a psyop meant to demoralize republicans. Usually they'd create the illusion that Abbot and Beto were close (just like they did with Abbott vs Wendy Davis even though he stomped her), but they're NOT doing that. Polls show Abbott dominating Beto. That's crazy. Even if it is a stomp they'd try to pretend its close. They're NOT doing that. That means they know they don't got the cheat they need in Texas.
The 180 to me is a reversal of fortune. Things seem bad under Biden. It looks like the people are getting screwed while the dems get away with everything. The reversal would be that become the opposite. The people start winning in a dramatic comeback and the cheaters start losing.
However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute.
"However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute."
Okay, this makes sense. The part I couldn't figure out was the fact that a red wave in the primaries wouldn't be much of a surprise, as this possibility has been put forth for quite some time now.
Something else I've had in the back of my mind: is it possible that something will come out of nowhere that stops the primaries dead in their tracks? Will we even get so far as conducting the primaries? There's still mail-in ballots going on in some states. What's to stop the Dems from just running the same playbook as last time? However, something big could come out of the woodwork that stops everything.
Great summation, SS.
I'm wondering, since the horse that won was red (representing the republicans), could this be about the Fall primaries? Are the dems realizing that they're going to get pummeled?
On the flip side of this, could it mean the exact opposite -- that the Dems have something up their sleeve to steal another election?? The 1 in 80 chance?
No, I think the Rich Strike is good news for our side.
The traditional string-pullers wouldn't be cast as the underdog. It also wouldn't depict a horse decked in Republican red that wins bigly in a shocking come from behind victory that no one saw coming if it were for the blue democrats.
If the dems could just "cheat" (which they've never been that successful at for midterms as mid term red waves often prove) their way to victory there were would be no stunning upset. It would already be over if it were that easy.
Q posts already talked about that NSA made it impossible for dems to win by electronic cheating. That is why they needed the pandemic in 2020.
Reference Q post #4688
That is why they couldn't steal the senate in 2018 like they wanted. Q talks about the NSA had already removed that power. They couldn't cheat by electronics anymore. It wouldn't be enough. Paper ballots were the only way and flagrant cheating.
Now that is also being systematically removed in many states. Paper ballots have been neutered in Texas and others states. Many former cheaters did not get the rewards they thought they would. Many are getting prosecuted (like the one who was caught in that undercover video bragging about her cheating in Texas).
A lot of city voting has moved into giant stadiums were there are cameras. The cheaters were made very aware of that in 2020 and will be nervous of those stadium cameras. Centralizing makes things easier to monitor. If you want more cheating you decentralize.
Plus polling would be lopsided and pushing for a "blue wave" when there is none. The blue wave narrative was just how much they planned to cheat by.
Polling at this point is usually just a psyop meant to demoralize republicans. Usually they'd create the illusion that Abbot and Beto were close (just like they did with Abbott vs Wendy Davis even though he stomped her), but they're NOT doing that. Polls show Abbott dominating Beto. That's crazy. Even if it is a stomp they'd try to pretend its close. They're NOT doing that. That means they know they don't got the cheat they need in Texas.
The 180 to me is a reversal of fortune. Things seem bad under Biden. It looks like the people are getting screwed while the dems get away with everything. The reversal would be that become the opposite. The people start winning in a dramatic comeback and the cheaters start losing.
However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute.
That's how it reads to me.
"However, how it happens will be the shocker. The winning horse will only appear at the last minute."
Okay, this makes sense. The part I couldn't figure out was the fact that a red wave in the primaries wouldn't be much of a surprise, as this possibility has been put forth for quite some time now.
Something else I've had in the back of my mind: is it possible that something will come out of nowhere that stops the primaries dead in their tracks? Will we even get so far as conducting the primaries? There's still mail-in ballots going on in some states. What's to stop the Dems from just running the same playbook as last time? However, something big could come out of the woodwork that stops everything.
Just a thought...