TRUMP IN MICHIGAN: "We still got cards to play... and we know when to play them... The Space Force will be very important..."
(media.greatawakening.win)
LET'S GOOoOo
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (339)
sorted by:
No buddy, I didnt ask for an example proving the earth spherical. I asked you to demonstrate curvature. I ask this because I know it cant be done and its fun watching people try to explain it. What you did was start with the assumption that it is a sphere, and then used that as a basis to explain why it is you see lights in the sky in a different manner based on your position. None of that proves curvature. You chose this "example" because you are unable to directly physically demonstrate curvature.
The horizon always rises to eye level and is always flat, no matter how high you go. How do you explain the horizon rising to eye level if you are on a ball? No matter the size, on a ball, as you ascend the horizon will drop below center. For some strange reason, that doesnt happen on earth. What youre saying about horizon visibility based on height is incorrect. You need to learn about perspective and convergence. Your sight is not infinite. Ships do not sail over the curve- check the p900 videos of out of sight objects supposedly below the horizon being brought back into full view using powerful magnification.
Night and day have nothing to do with physically proving curvature. Again, you are using lights in the sky to draw conclusions.
Using a theory of a force you cannot detect also has nothing to do with curvature. Lets focus on curvature for now. I am willing to debate these other issues with you separately.
Show me the experiment that measures the curvature lol. Show me the photo that shows curvature (without using NASA or gov space agencies of course lol).
Thats a nice formula you've got there, but youre engaging in pilpul. The 8" per mile squared formula is just fine for approximating the curvature dip on distances up to several hundred miles. Only when you get past a certain point does it produce erroneous mathematical results.
The horizon does not rise to eye level. Why would you think that it does? If you look straight forward so that your line of sight is level (perpendicular to gravity), then the horizon will fall below that line as you rise in altitude. This is easily observable.
A simple hydrostatic leveling rig can be used to see this. It is a tool for measuring level. Using that one can easily see that at relatively low altitudes (a couple thousand feet), the horizon falls well below level. A bubble level or plumb level could be used as well.
I asked how you explain night and day with a flat Earth model. I noticed you completely avoided answering that.
As for the formula, you asked "can you provide me with the formula for determining the curvature rate of a 25k mile circumference sphere?" I merely provided you with exactly what you asked for.
You’re one of the better sports about this whole issue. Most people devolve into name calling by now. Many of the arguments you’ve provided are far better than I’m used to encountering. I don’t actually think the earth is flat, but I don’t know that it’s round anymore either. This is more of an exercise in frivolity for me. Part of the great awakening is coming to the realization that much of what we’ve been “taught” was actually indoctrination into some sort of satanic nightmare.
Do you believe in god? Who is the god of Freemasons? Do Freemasons go to space? Do they go to the moon? Are Freemasons trustworthy? Why does the number 666 appear over and over again when looking at the heliocentric model measurements? Just a coincidence? Why did the results of the rectilineator experiment suggest earth is concave?