Whenever anybody with some following or stature starts sounding more like Patriotic Populist, you can be sure that posts will show up either implying or directing us to hate on them.
We have obvious real opponents like Hillary, Pelosi, Fauci, Soros, and so on. Russell Brand is not the problem because he liked that Globalist once.
I dont always agree with Lap but he's right. This has been reposted on here daily ever since it first appeared. It gets reposted more than any of his videos that align with our own thoughts and ideas. Even his 60 second shorts don't get much attention and we've got a bunch of users that don't read articles or even comments with answers they were looking for lol. I'm of the position that folks like Elon/Rogan/AJ are controlled opposition but RB seemed like the closest possible match to an insider who has been kicked or left that inner circle. His ability to question the narrative on YT without censorship and still get roles in "big/mainstream" movies mean he's worth keeping an eye on.
Dude, if you were pointing out the facts, you would have titled this post as
"Whose side is he on?? Russell Brand THOUGHT This Psycopath Yuval Noah Harrari Is A Beautiful Person"
Because this is from 5 years ago. Which in terms of human history and human awakening is about 1000 years ago. Remember? Covid? Election theft? Ukraine? Mainstream Media lies?
It's absolutely not factual to post something that happened or was in place 5 years ago and assert that it is the present.
I mean, it's a valid question, but it looks like your own biases are making you think you're just 'pointing out the facts", when clearly you aren't.
Fact: This was him saying this on video..nothing more..nothing less..question everything..have you been paying attention as of late? I merely posed a question..I did NOT say he was on their side...you interpet my question as bias...I am subbed to him on BC and watch many of vids...I really like what he says..we should know he said this..just because I question something means it is notable and we should be aware..your bias is showing..
I'll confess to that bias. I like Brand, and what he is doing.
You are of course correct that it was him saying this recorded. But it wasn't factual (well, not accurate) to say "Russel Brand thinks....." because it was a rather significant time ago. Sadly, enough people will look simply at your title, at the photo, and conclude "Yes, this is what Russell Brand THINKS (now)...."
But I appreciate what you are saying: it's good to raise facts and question things.
I will also admit to a knee-jerk reaction. It rises when I see or perceive anons and pedes jumping to conclusions and just dumping on people or things based on rather flimsy evidence. This is something that aids the shills and downgrades the quality of the board. But, I think in hindsight I also jumped to the conclusion myself that you were doing that.
Thanks for the response. It clears things up.
On a larger scale, the problems related to this sort of thing exist because it can actually be hard to post to the board in a neutral questioning way, because we always have a squadron of members who will upvote and promote something based simply on a headline, or an image, without really applying either due diligence or serious cerebral input. In other words, low effort reactionism.
And here is the older version of Russell Brand mocking Klaus Schwab for exactly why we don't like Klaus or his WEF or DAVOS.
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/russell-brand-impression-of-klaus-schwab/
The more RB attacks the elite, the more random criticism will show up here and elsewhere.
Just pointing out the facts..nothing more.
You could also post a picture of Trump with Epstein with a similar title.
Just pointing out the facts!
Yawn
Yup. It is a pattern.
Whenever anybody with some following or stature starts sounding more like Patriotic Populist, you can be sure that posts will show up either implying or directing us to hate on them.
We have obvious real opponents like Hillary, Pelosi, Fauci, Soros, and so on. Russell Brand is not the problem because he liked that Globalist once.
I dont always agree with Lap but he's right. This has been reposted on here daily ever since it first appeared. It gets reposted more than any of his videos that align with our own thoughts and ideas. Even his 60 second shorts don't get much attention and we've got a bunch of users that don't read articles or even comments with answers they were looking for lol. I'm of the position that folks like Elon/Rogan/AJ are controlled opposition but RB seemed like the closest possible match to an insider who has been kicked or left that inner circle. His ability to question the narrative on YT without censorship and still get roles in "big/mainstream" movies mean he's worth keeping an eye on.
Dude, if you were pointing out the facts, you would have titled this post as
"Whose side is he on?? Russell Brand THOUGHT This Psycopath Yuval Noah Harrari Is A Beautiful Person"
Because this is from 5 years ago. Which in terms of human history and human awakening is about 1000 years ago. Remember? Covid? Election theft? Ukraine? Mainstream Media lies?
It's absolutely not factual to post something that happened or was in place 5 years ago and assert that it is the present.
I mean, it's a valid question, but it looks like your own biases are making you think you're just 'pointing out the facts", when clearly you aren't.
Fact: This was him saying this on video..nothing more..nothing less..question everything..have you been paying attention as of late? I merely posed a question..I did NOT say he was on their side...you interpet my question as bias...I am subbed to him on BC and watch many of vids...I really like what he says..we should know he said this..just because I question something means it is notable and we should be aware..your bias is showing..
I'll confess to that bias. I like Brand, and what he is doing.
You are of course correct that it was him saying this recorded. But it wasn't factual (well, not accurate) to say "Russel Brand thinks....." because it was a rather significant time ago. Sadly, enough people will look simply at your title, at the photo, and conclude "Yes, this is what Russell Brand THINKS (now)...."
But I appreciate what you are saying: it's good to raise facts and question things.
I will also admit to a knee-jerk reaction. It rises when I see or perceive anons and pedes jumping to conclusions and just dumping on people or things based on rather flimsy evidence. This is something that aids the shills and downgrades the quality of the board. But, I think in hindsight I also jumped to the conclusion myself that you were doing that.
Thanks for the response. It clears things up.
On a larger scale, the problems related to this sort of thing exist because it can actually be hard to post to the board in a neutral questioning way, because we always have a squadron of members who will upvote and promote something based simply on a headline, or an image, without really applying either due diligence or serious cerebral input. In other words, low effort reactionism.
Anyway, one step at a time.