This is probably going to rustle some feathers given that thread a mod stickied a while back, but it has to be said. EVERYTHING going on right now in regards to the trans crap and pedophilia is because of the forced acceptance of the gay agenda. You can say that they're piggybacking all you want, but the fact remains that the slippery slope "fallacy" has all but been proven true at this point.
Most people will generally agree that what two consenting adults do in private is between them and God. I won't say I don't care, because I don't want them to go to hell, but it's none of my business what they do in private, and I don't want to know what they do in private.
But this constant gay agenda acceptance push, legalizing gay marriage (personally I think marriage shouldn't be a government institution anyway, but that's another story), forcing everyone to compromise their beliefs and faith to make appease a fringe minority, etc. etc. has done nothing but cause a moral degradation of society.
Personally, I think it's a neurological defect. Which used to be the official psychologist narrative for decades until all of a sudden all mental health problems were "misdiagnosed because of intolerance" for hundreds of years. So I firmly believe there's probably a treatment for it just like how there's hundreds of cures for basically every disease, virus, and sickness known to man that's been held from us by the cabal.
But the point remains, and you can disagree if you want but everyone knows I'm right when I say this. If we don't rip out the entire rainbow tree out by the root, we'll just end up right back here in a few generations. It's just like any form of corruption, if you don't completely get rid of it, it'll fester and grow and come back once again.
And I don't know about everyone else, but anything that ultimately leads to satanic transhumanism and pedophilia is not something I find "acceptable" in any way, shape, form, or how.
You aren't being very specific about what you want banned. For the government to ban something, means you get fined or go to prison if you do that thing.
What do you want people fined or imprisoned for? Do you want them punished for "LGBTQ yadda yadda yadda"? How do you envision this being enforced?
With regards to marriages being an official government status:
The government must be involved in marriage because there are basic legal issues there. For example, you and your wife are one before the law. Which means she cannot be compelled to testify against her husband or vice versa.
If there was nothing official about marriage then anybody could say they are married to anybody and use that in court to avoid testifying.
And marriage also changes tax status and so on. It has to be official.
Not really, are we forgetting that up until 2012 all of this crap was illegal in most parts of the country and not socially acceptable. Not hard to revert back to that and tack a few laws banning gay propaganda and restricting activism. Russia, Poland, and Hungary are VERY good examples of how to do this the right way. Kill off the means of it spreading and contain what exists and it will die off on it's own. You can't ban or imprison people for what they do in private, that's a line that shouldn't be crossed. But you can create limits on what is allowed in the general public, and public institutions (colleges, schools, libraries, etc. etc.).
Likewise you can regulate what public corporations are allowed to do as far as donations go. Personally, I believe they shouldn't be allowed to donate to any sort of agenda. All donations should either be general good will (Feed the homeless, build low income housing, clothing for underprivileged children, etc.), or something that will help society as a whole (Medical research, Tesla-ish engineering, etc.).
As for marriage being a legal institution, I understand that. I'm saying it shouldn't be marriage. Call it a legal union if you want, but marriage in and of itself is typically a religious ceremony and shouldn't be beholden to the government. This is how you get scenarios like a pair of gays suing a pastor or preacher because they won't oversee the "wedding". Or bakeries being sued for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a "gay marriage".
This really isn't as hard as people make it out to be. There's precedent in other nations that show how to do it right and how to make it work.
"Love is love" "Diversity is our strength" "All in it together" "Our Democracy" "Nation of Immigrants"
"The government MUST be involved in marriage because they're already involved with marriage and we need them more involved to solve the problems of them being involved." - Lapstrake