I understand what you're saying..but they need to prove the guilt instead of assuming you're guilty first.
Like I said before, if you did not contribute to any of the child porn stuff then you shouldn't be charged with a crime just BECAUSE it happens to be on your computer that ANYONE can freely download. They still need to prove in a court of law how a specific person contributed to said crime. I really don't care what you download..it could be anything. Just using this because its the topic.
IF YOU DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE MAKING, FILMING, DISTRIBUTION, SHARING, ETC then you shouldn't be labelled a criminal.
THEY NEED TO PROVE YOU'RE GUILTY OF HARM. IN A CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF LAW THAT WOULD BE VERY DAMN HARD TO DO.
In our kangaroo courts..you're guilty until proven innocent. Look at theJ6ers. That's not freedom.
I understand what you're saying..but they need to prove the guilt instead of assuming you're guilty first.
Like I said before, if you did not contribute to any of the child porn stuff then you shouldn't be charged with a crime just BECAUSE it happens to be on your computer that ANYONE can freely download. They still need to prove in a court of law how a specific person contributed to said crime. I really don't care what you download..it could be anything. Just using this because its the topic.
IF YOU DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE MAKING, FILMING, DISTRIBUTION, SHARING, ETC then you shouldn't be labelled a criminal.
THEY NEED TO PROVE YOU'RE GUILTY OF HARM. IN A CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF LAW THAT WOULD BE VERY DAMN HARD TO DO.
In our kangaroo courts..you're guilty until proven innocent. Look at theJ6ers. That's not freedom.