This presupposes you to have a special line with God where he told you personally that he is.
You in turn tell that to the Legal department of a bank.
Let' s see ......
I have not heard what you are saying so, .... do you have any overwhelming proof that what I heard is not what it should be? Discovery is such a bitch!
Hearsay! You cannot even make a decent legal argument.
you would be writing: " you are breaking the law " .... this is not even an argument! This is a a judgement. Since when do you exist in 14 independent versions? 12 jury-members, 1 prosecutor and 1 defender?
In relation to point 3: Do you feel ..... like suffering from a multi-personality-disorder? We certainly need a psych-eval.
if you do not have a million plus service agreement with this bank ..... no one will listen. For you a thousand others.....
So, what then is your purpose with an entity you have no relationship with?
Actually, Roe v. Wade ruling says that ANY of the freedom amendments to the Constitution allow for making your own decision.
The problem with Roe v Wade is that the governments thought they needed to expend public tax payer money, (which is a lie because it is not your money but the Fed's) instead of insisting on private funds, which is how it should be.
This brings me to the sixt and final argument. Your Constitution allows you freedom of speech, so you had your say. But so do the other people who disagree with you, based on the same argument. And these people are allowed to do with your "offer" whatever they want. Do not be surprised if your letter finds itself into the shredder.
You are claiming God is angry.
This presupposes you to have a special line with God where he told you personally that he is.
You in turn tell that to the Legal department of a bank.
Let' s see ......
I have not heard what you are saying so, .... do you have any overwhelming proof that what I heard is not what it should be? Discovery is such a bitch!
Hearsay! You cannot even make a decent legal argument.
you would be writing: " you are breaking the law " .... this is not even an argument! This is a a judgement. Since when do you exist in 14 independent versions? 12 jury-members, 1 prosecutor and 1 defender?
In relation to point 3: Do you feel ..... like suffering from a multi-personality-disorder? We certainly need a psych-eval.
if you do not have a million plus service agreement with this bank ..... no one will listen. For you a thousand others.....
So, what then is your purpose with an entity you have no relationship with?
Actually, Roe v. Wade ruling says that ANY of the freedom amendments to the Constitution allow for making your own decision.
The problem with Roe v Wade is that the governments thought they needed to expend public tax payer money, (which is a lie because it is not your money but the Fed's) instead of insisting on private funds, which is how it should be.
This brings me to the sixt and final argument. Your Constitution allows you freedom of speech, so you had your say. But so do the other people who disagree with you, based on the same argument. And these people are allowed to do with your "offer" whatever they want. Do not be surprised if your letter finds itself into the shredder.