Regardless of whether or not Stew Peters is a charlatan, are you serious about using Google for truth? That's laughable.
You are quoting incidences of censorship by corrupt platforms as backup to your claim.
The fact is that truth is not black and white and no one has a monopoly on it. Stew Peter's previous occupation (if lawful) is irrelevant. He gets caught up with some questionable content; but he also gets some excellent interviews.
He puts out tons of content and covers topics that MSM won't touch. Joe Rogan is MSM controlled opposition. He can't afford to pursue the truth.
Appealing to authority is what hot us into this mess.
Regardless of whether or not Stew Peters is a charlatan, are you serious about using Google for truth? That's laughable.
You are quoting incidences of censorship by corrupt platforms as backup to your claim.
The fact is that truth is not black and white and no one has a monopoly on it. Stew Peter's previous occupation (if lawful) is irrelevant. He gets caught up with some questionable content; but he also gets some excellent interviews.
He puts out tons of content and covers topics that MSM won't touch. Joe Rogan is MSM controlled opposition. He can't afford to pursue the truth.
Appealing to authority is what hot us into this mess.
"Regardless of whether or not Stew Peters is a charlatan, are you serious about using Google for truth? That's laughable."
No