So, how is mass-awareness of a potential false flag on April 18 in New York, as a means to prevent that false flag, be scare tactics?
Maybe, would your answer rather reflect how the message of the video reverberated with you?
I think it may even be called scapegoating. Because, should the nuclear war be waged .... who' s fault would that be? Or the false flag on Washington DC spreading along the east-coast of the US not prevented due to not preventing the false flag on April 18 .... who' s fault would that be?
Blood'n guts! Fortunately, I am not equipped with such convulsions.
I think it is very cleverly put together. My question would be, if they could see the chances of success of aversion of the negative timeline in 2016 to be 29%, why come forward at this point in time when the probability of success has shrunk to 4.8%?
Sounds like scare tactics.
So, how is mass-awareness of a potential false flag on April 18 in New York, as a means to prevent that false flag, be scare tactics?
Maybe, would your answer rather reflect how the message of the video reverberated with you?
I think it may even be called scapegoating. Because, should the nuclear war be waged .... who' s fault would that be? Or the false flag on Washington DC spreading along the east-coast of the US not prevented due to not preventing the false flag on April 18 .... who' s fault would that be?
Blood'n guts! Fortunately, I am not equipped with such convulsions.
I think it is very cleverly put together. My question would be, if they could see the chances of success of aversion of the negative timeline in 2016 to be 29%, why come forward at this point in time when the probability of success has shrunk to 4.8%?