A lot of people on the net use HT,.the fact that what i post is on several channels,Monkey werkz post nearly a whole story on it,.if you think its false then post what you have to show its false,.show your evidence that its false ,this site is supposed to be about helping people but people like you like to put others down,.and i call them doomers,.If i want to use Hal Turner and alot of people do,.even Dan Bongino,s show commented on Hal Turner,...then thats my right,. I have seen several posts on here from HT and BIN ,2 sites people like to doom and yet if you take the same story on those sites,and say post it from from Bitchute, or Rumble ,.its fine,.its belivable,..Its just the names of the Sites people go by,.I have never put down anyones posts on here ever,never called bullshit or fake,.if i have not heard the story I will just move on an thats all you need to do,.I have worked in Mil,Intel,.So with all thats going on right now,.theres is no way anyone can post anything with 100% certainty its the Truth,.So dont go around acting like a know it all,..read a post ,not sure move on ,..thats what i do,..Respect what people post,..,
MW is a factual source. Of course we all can hypothesize and reach for meaning. Hall Turner does that in his own way. Hence, he has been more times wrong then I care to count.
Hence, he is NOT a reliable source. This is not about 100% right. This is about crafty pieces containing one fact and spinning into screaming wolf!
So with all thats going on right now
Then we can dispense with the bull shit. Besides, what MW is posting was factual. THAT would have been worthy of a post. But no, HT is being used as a source, and with it, his dooming alarmist shit.
You either learn or you don't. Echo-chambering is easy, quick and does not take a lot of IQ. If that is your cup of tea ..... so be it, it is still crap you are pushing.
And I also notice something else. The problem I exemplified with a very strong case, is not rebutted at all. You know why? Because you know it is correct. Yet, you are still defending the same practice.
I say: get of your lazy ass and put your back into it.
.
A lot of people on the net use HT,.the fact that what i post is on several channels,Monkey werkz post nearly a whole story on it,.if you think its false then post what you have to show its false,.show your evidence that its false ,this site is supposed to be about helping people but people like you like to put others down,.and i call them doomers,.If i want to use Hal Turner and alot of people do,.even Dan Bongino,s show commented on Hal Turner,...then thats my right,. I have seen several posts on here from HT and BIN ,2 sites people like to doom and yet if you take the same story on those sites,and say post it from from Bitchute, or Rumble ,.its fine,.its belivable,..Its just the names of the Sites people go by,.I have never put down anyones posts on here ever,never called bullshit or fake,.if i have not heard the story I will just move on an thats all you need to do,.I have worked in Mil,Intel,.So with all thats going on right now,.theres is no way anyone can post anything with 100% certainty its the Truth,.So dont go around acting like a know it all,..read a post ,not sure move on ,..thats what i do,..Respect what people post,..,
This is not about your RIGHT to use a source.
This about pushing crap.
MW is a factual source. Of course we all can hypothesize and reach for meaning. Hall Turner does that in his own way. Hence, he has been more times wrong then I care to count.
Hence, he is NOT a reliable source. This is not about 100% right. This is about crafty pieces containing one fact and spinning into screaming wolf!
Then we can dispense with the bull shit. Besides, what MW is posting was factual. THAT would have been worthy of a post. But no, HT is being used as a source, and with it, his dooming alarmist shit.
You either learn or you don't. Echo-chambering is easy, quick and does not take a lot of IQ. If that is your cup of tea ..... so be it, it is still crap you are pushing.
And I also notice something else. The problem I exemplified with a very strong case, is not rebutted at all. You know why? Because you know it is correct. Yet, you are still defending the same practice.
I say: get of your lazy ass and put your back into it. .