e: 'Satan is not too far fetched for you"... The christian satan? Which one? Sha'hai-tan? The prosecutorial adversary? Lucifer? What makes you so sure I subscribe to any such anthropromorphic notion? I do understand why and how they vary.
Part of your initial reply of: "How's his Satanic symbol-flashing ex-wife doing these days?" led me to the assumption that you subscribe to some sort anthropromorphic notion of this character.
The LARPing of sitchin has some very interesting characteristics, one of them being what is referred to scientists as 'Junk DNA' which is that 90% of human DNA is inactive, which is very interesting. Its almost as if a more advanced species created humans in their image using their DNA in a laboratory, however switched off the majority of the functions of that DNA. Further to this the missing link so often discussed, is not a small step from one species to the next, it is a number of steps missing from one species to the next, which lends more credibility to this story, that there was an event that took place that created this giant change in DNA. Then there is evidence of humans mining gold in the cradle of human kind in South Africa pre 100K BC: https://newsrescue.com/ancient-200000bc-human-metropolis-found-in-africa/
We have plenty of overlapping stories intentionally designed to create confusion, however due to the intricacies of these stories, and how they all link to each other in some esoteric way, and how effectively we have been manipulated by the 'powers that be' sometimes makes me think that this is not the first time that this has been done to a planet or species like ours, lending more weight to the THEORY that we might actually be being manipulated by a more advanced species.
When I use the word Satanic in a public forum, it is received in many ways.
Knowing it's perceived in many ways, one still has to be chosen.
'Satanic' is the one that most seem to agree to mean evil in association with the Christian notion of 'Satan'.
There may have been actual manipulations of genetic information in humans in the past. Controlled mating does that in itself.
DNA doesn't act or not act, it triggers chemicals to create conditions on systems that exist to act. There are inert genetic triggers that some geneticists say is proof of common ancestry. I get all that.
I also see the strangeness of Rh negative and positive blood types suggesting contact with another species in the past.
The 'bluebloods' kept their genepool pretty tight, so that difference would show in indicators in the future.
We're currently struggling with the idea that one race should rule over others as their superior when the criteria for 'superior' is merely racial genetic tags.
If aliens or 'advanced race' built the pyramids, they still would have to use technology that we puny 'humans' could understand. Once learning it, does that make puny humans 'advanced' or 'even'? If some species came along and improved on the idea, does that mean they get to move into the White House?
They why wasn't Tesla elected president of the world? Would that be a smart thing to do?
'Advanced' is a relative term that includes the concept of time.
Universal Truths are timeless, belong to no race or species or time frame.
Technology allows various plays upon these truths in different forms.
Some are 'superior' to others in some ways, and 'inferior' in others.
A computer that filled a room can fit on a chip now.
Does that make modern man 'superior' in a way that allows him to claim domination of inferior races?
Yes.
How unfortunate that the word 'domination' and 'dominion' are conflated with each other.
I've met bluebloods. I have bluebloods on both sides of my lines.
Many were nearly sub-human in their view of humanity as beneath them.
Part of your initial reply of: "How's his Satanic symbol-flashing ex-wife doing these days?" led me to the assumption that you subscribe to some sort anthropromorphic notion of this character.
The LARPing of sitchin has some very interesting characteristics, one of them being what is referred to scientists as 'Junk DNA' which is that 90% of human DNA is inactive, which is very interesting. Its almost as if a more advanced species created humans in their image using their DNA in a laboratory, however switched off the majority of the functions of that DNA. Further to this the missing link so often discussed, is not a small step from one species to the next, it is a number of steps missing from one species to the next, which lends more credibility to this story, that there was an event that took place that created this giant change in DNA. Then there is evidence of humans mining gold in the cradle of human kind in South Africa pre 100K BC: https://newsrescue.com/ancient-200000bc-human-metropolis-found-in-africa/
We have plenty of overlapping stories intentionally designed to create confusion, however due to the intricacies of these stories, and how they all link to each other in some esoteric way, and how effectively we have been manipulated by the 'powers that be' sometimes makes me think that this is not the first time that this has been done to a planet or species like ours, lending more weight to the THEORY that we might actually be being manipulated by a more advanced species.
When I use the word Satanic in a public forum, it is received in many ways. Knowing it's perceived in many ways, one still has to be chosen. 'Satanic' is the one that most seem to agree to mean evil in association with the Christian notion of 'Satan'.
There may have been actual manipulations of genetic information in humans in the past. Controlled mating does that in itself.
DNA doesn't act or not act, it triggers chemicals to create conditions on systems that exist to act. There are inert genetic triggers that some geneticists say is proof of common ancestry. I get all that.
I also see the strangeness of Rh negative and positive blood types suggesting contact with another species in the past.
The 'bluebloods' kept their genepool pretty tight, so that difference would show in indicators in the future.
We're currently struggling with the idea that one race should rule over others as their superior when the criteria for 'superior' is merely racial genetic tags.
If aliens or 'advanced race' built the pyramids, they still would have to use technology that we puny 'humans' could understand. Once learning it, does that make puny humans 'advanced' or 'even'? If some species came along and improved on the idea, does that mean they get to move into the White House?
They why wasn't Tesla elected president of the world? Would that be a smart thing to do?
'Advanced' is a relative term that includes the concept of time.
Universal Truths are timeless, belong to no race or species or time frame.
Technology allows various plays upon these truths in different forms.
Some are 'superior' to others in some ways, and 'inferior' in others.
A computer that filled a room can fit on a chip now.
Does that make modern man 'superior' in a way that allows him to claim domination of inferior races?
Yes.
How unfortunate that the word 'domination' and 'dominion' are conflated with each other.
I've met bluebloods. I have bluebloods on both sides of my lines.
Many were nearly sub-human in their view of humanity as beneath them.
I look down on them as they do others.