I will start by saying that I find this extremely interesting, yet my gut just says somethings off. He starts the video off claiming/implying the virus wasn't sequenced from Bat DNA but rather snake DNA (at this point still a theory.) To me it makes much more sense that there was gain of function being performed with snake venom which ppl then caught, rather than contracting from the water.

I think a lot of information is very intriguing and informative and the video was produced very effectively to convey an message. However, if you watch the video several times you will see some serious questions need to be investigated or that the theatrics make things seem like facts that are not. For instance, the part about the waste water research locations. He shows a map and makes the statement it's mainly East Coast and I think he mentions 32 cities. Is he making the claim that these facilities would be responsible for putting in the snake venom? Is he saying they are all doing it but they are only researching 32 facilities. Also, if we're differentiating, like another stated, between waste water and city/potable water, then how does that thread add to this theory, other then mentioning research on water and covid? If we are saying it IS only those facilities, how do we explain people catching covid in the beginning in other states or the West Coast. Even if it was only certain cities, I would expect that atleast 90% of that city would have contracted the virus all at once. Even if you try to claim that ppl drink bottle water, which most are tap water anyways but lets say you have a brand that truly isn't, I doubt there are significant amounts of city populace that not only drink that water but also shower with it, brush their teeth with it, cook with it, clean their dishes with it, and bring it with them to any other house/restaurant and never use ice cubes out of the house. Sure, there are some ppl that have filtration systems or are this vigilant (but how many ppl think like that in the city) and then you have the nicotine part, but that still leaves hundreds of thousands coming into contact with poisoned water at the same time. I really had to think about how much tap water is used daily. This is the argument for fluoride poisoning after all, that we are getting it in so many ways it becomes extremely hazardous.

It appears anything dealing with the water aspect was glossed over quickly. Considering it's the title of the video I would have hoped for more data, even circumstantial. I'm just worried that this retired chiropractor (apologies for forgetting his name at this time) felt he had discovered something really important, knew about the movement and the drops, and worked out a theory to link it to the "watch the water" to gain traction quickly. If you take away the theory of it being in the water it could still have significant value. In my opinion, it not only does not lessen the information he's providing it actually makes it stronger. Most of the world already ate up the narrative that it came from a Bat, ok that was wrong it was a snake. I just think there wasn't any tangible evidence of it being put in the water yet thats what everyones talking about, what the interview is titled, what every other podcast thats talking about it is titling theirs. He DID however provide substantial evidence (patents, research, circumstantial) of it being in the vaxx. I just think we should think clearly and calmly while looking at the information instead of reaching to try to make it work because we want the meaning of the "watch the water" so badly.

Another thing that struck me as off was the way the Covid research doctor was conveyed. The only things stated about him are that he made a statement he was going to release his research which would be a major development, was shot/murdered prior to release, and that his boss claimed the research would still be published but 1 1/2 years later still hasn't. The only real connection provided for him to the snake venom theory, other then the Chiropractor's hunch,is the fortune cookie. Coincidentally his name is the translation for English's ice skating (which links us back to a form of water) and finishes the story in a nice little bow with the fortune being, essentially, everything worthwhile is the product of one initial action (all the world's riches start from a single penny.) I mean, I know we're supposed to be watching a movie, but that part seemed right out of a lifetime flick.

Again, the music, the cuts, the editing, makes you WANT to believe all of it. I could get behind the toxins in the vaxx, I could get behind gain of function from King Cobras etc., but I can't get behind it being in the water supply without something much more substantial. I don't think this is the water we should be looking out for. With love always, just my opinion

Side thought After my first watch I had a thought I couldn't shake. When a snake bites you, the venom transmits into the body in the form of a liquid. Essentially a snakes bodily fluid? If they created this in a lab with snake genes could it possibly make human body fluids (ex saliva through kissing) "toxic" to people who are not infected. Is this how we could explain the shedding phenomenon or how two ppl in a household could both test positive but have totally different symptoms? This is probably crazy, or more appropriate to the vaxxines, because to my knowledge the "virus" makes the body produce proteins but doesn't alter your DNA like the vaxx does.