Chemtrails - you think its conspiracy? Big tech is hiding info related to it in search engines
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Lots of videos but not one documented book. A book would be subject to verification, and bogus material would be identified and criticized. Who bothers to take videos seriously, when there is no data available to verify claims, or evidence published and cited? It's all "trust me, I'm trustworthy."
I don't deny what there is credible evidence for. But as an aeronautical engineer, with a 40-year career in the aircraft industry, living under the flightpath to and from an international airport, I have a rather expert understanding of contrails. You, on the other hand, have bought into a gigantic package deal of conspiracies. I'm not saying that any or all are right or wrong, but only that they have to be taken individually, and an objective scientific view is necessary. I have learned a phrase from being on this page: Don't fill your ignorance with prejudice; you will be worse off.
I was into the John Birch Society when I was a teenager in the 60s, so I defer to no one in the "wake up" department. You, on the other hand, are happy to be scientifically ignorant, so my advice is "read a book."
I've been observing the sky for 50-60 years, where contrails were not a usual thing in the mid-1950s. Now they can be seen all the time. There is a wide range of contrails and nothing distinctive that would merit being called a chemtrail. The proof can be conclusive: documentation of spraying equipment in a commercial airliner. But it has to be proven that it is spraying equipment and not some ordinary purge vent. You won't find it. The plumbing needed for that sort of equipment would be completely noticeable during factory assembly, which happens in a very big place with lots of people involved. No such equipment on board.
You just have some idee fixe of what contrails are and aren't...and you are wrong. The idea that they are quickly transient is very mistaken. They are only a form of cloud, and clouds can vanish or linger.
A book can be taken seriously, because the lack of supporting evidence citation would be a glaring omission. It is possible to verify the information independently. Videos are meant for the undiscerning eye and grease by without any means of verification, stitched together with lots of unsubstantiated allegation. Once it is cooked up, there is no independent means of verification, as there are no objective details to verify. You don't win a legal case with "Check out this video, Judge."
Another reason I don't take you seriously is that you belabor "chemtrails" from utterly innocuous contrails---yet completely bypass the authentic huge chemical plumes resulting from space launches involving large solid-propellant boosters (hydrochloric acid and aluminum oxide dust). Somehow, that is beneath your notice, and everyone admits to what those plumes amount to. Yet, the weather washes it out of the sky and the southern Florida air is fresh again. You get excited where they aren't, and don't give a shit where they unmistakably are. You just aren't serious or consistent in your concerns.