Watch The Water Update: additional info out today
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
****** First Reply Is Now A Permalink to Map Or Project Manage Our Work! Please Reply Right Below The First Response Mine/Brent75 as we map out the info!******
Ann Vandersteel did an update with Dr. Ardis. He adds more info today or added info, and he did an interview with Scott McCay yesterday below too. So we have updated info to dig into Anons for this Covid-MnRNA Venom theory. God bless your work!
4-12-22: https://rumble.com/v10r8pq-dr.-bryan-ardis-snake-venom-update-its-not-about-the-water.html
If there's anything that I'm going to take away from this, it's these two things.
The first is that the COVID disease operates fudamentally via proteins. That includes bioengineered spike proteins, enzymes and mRNA strands. If it were a bioengineered bioweapon created in a biolab, the designs for those must come from somewhere.
The second is that whatever those proteins are, they must enter our bodies through some kind of vector. The vector could be water, or air, or food, or snake or insect bites, or direct injection, or the crowns of a bioengineered coronavirus.
Dr Ardis has put forward at least two plausible and potentially true hypotheses. The first, and primary hypothesis, is that snake venom proteins are a component of this disease. This one I find more interesting and acceptable. The symptoms that we have observed for COVID, and the side effects from ventilation, remdesivir and the vaccines, all correlate substantially with snake venom poisoning.
For example, we have observed blood clots from the vaccines: the direct effect of snake venom on the coagulation of human blood is an observable event, as seen in this video by ABC catalyst:
https://www.9xyoutube.com/watch?v=BtJ0g_78i6I
The second and weaker hypothesis is that water is a vector for this disease. This one is much weaker. Dr Ardis's suspicion is primarily drawn from observations of the CDC's PCR testing of the water supply, and logical conjecture about their behaviour. However, there are other plausible explanations about their testing behaviour, and there are other vectors for the transmission of proteins. There are observations that we can make about the behaviour of venom proteins in the water as well, including whether the proteins can remain stable in such an environment.
As we consider Dr Ardis's hypotheses, remember, we do not have to accept all hypotheses as being true. Both may be true, only one may be true, or none may be true. Or, none may be true but give us clues as to the nature of this disease. For example, I've already established a postion where I believe Dr Richard Fleming's explanation of how spike proteins work and how they are bioengineered. After Dr Ardis's hypothesis I think it is plausible that at least some of the protein may be from snake venom, but would need more information to test and verify this hypothesis.