He definitely shouldn't have used taxpayer money for this, but if its possible to run a 1bn development program without using your own billion, I'd do so as well. Wouldnt make me deep state. Musk is against this kind of govt spending but took the money because they were going to spend it on something else retarded anyways
Wrong again, Musk spends most of his time on Tesla compared to his other companies, and he is very involved
"per NWO orders" Just because theres a push from the NWO to go to electric cars doesnt mean anyone who makes them is 'taking orders' to make them. It also definitely did not go profitable overnight, Tesla was founded in 2003. In the recent years he ran very close to bankruptcy several times due to the risks he was taking for innovation. Now it is profitable due to these risks
He isn't "Against AI". You would think, if you were going to be someones critic, you would listen to them speak - Musk talks about AI a lot. Musk understands that AI is dangerous - he understands that in the wrong hands, it can be used for evil. Newsflash - everything in the wrong hands can be used for evil. Musk is involved in the development of AI specifically because he fears it - and he is smart enough to know that AI is inevitable. If you fear something that is inevitable, you involve yourself in it to have some sort of control/influence.
Same thing with neuralink. He is doing it because it is inevitable (neuralink terrifies me, and it terrifies Musk). He speaks a lot about this too - his main goal with neuralink is to treat mental disorders. And it makes a lot of sense. Can you imagine if we can actually cure/prevent/treat dementia or alzheimers? He also is very very clear that he is vehemently against this sort of technology ever being forced on anyone
His family does throw up a red flag, specifically his Mom. Its plausible that the DS had a hand in getting Musk where he is, but if that was the case, the strings have certainly been cut now. Seriously - listen to the man speak, he rails against liberalism, communism, socialism, NWO, globalism, constantly.
Many people see the money, and that blinds them to everything else - he isnt an enemy or a deepstater or a globalist just because he is a billionaire.
If you came up with a good idea, executed it, sold the company for a hundred mil or so, would you start to accuse yourself of being deepstate? Your logic would check out.
how do you know they weren't his ideas? This is the part about backing up your claims
I dont have to prove they are Elon's ideas, because he claims they are and is the executor of the ideas. He clearly is intelligent, and he clearly is capable of coming up with the ideas, since he is executing them well, and can go into great detail when talking about them. You claim they are not his ideas, with no proof except for his family ties (outside of anyones control who that is) and his wives (which he has divorced, has he not? all of them)
And I agree it's not capitalistic to take taxpayer money, but you cant use one thing to define the whole picture. I'd prefer he didn't take subsidies, but he did because he is a smart business man. I would take "free" (yes I know it isn't really free) money, if I knew for a fact that money was going to go to someone else anyways, if it didn't happen to be me that secured it.
Hm yes, why would a businessman use investor money to reduce his risk instead of his own money? It's truly a mystery. You can't possibly hope to persuade anyone when you mix in garbage like that.
No, there isn't
Many people see the money, and that blinds them to everything else - he isnt an enemy or a deepstater or a globalist just because he is a billionaire.
If you came up with a good idea, executed it, sold the company for a hundred mil or so, would you start to accuse yourself of being deepstate? Your logic would check out.
Thats not a healthy mindset to have, instantly not liking someone because of their wealth and successes.
how do you know they weren't his ideas? This is the part about backing up your claims
I dont have to prove they are Elon's ideas, because he claims they are and is the executor of the ideas. He clearly is intelligent, and he clearly is capable of coming up with the ideas, since he is executing them well, and can go into great detail when talking about them. You claim they are not his ideas, with no proof except for his family ties (outside of anyones control who that is) and his wives (which he has divorced, has he not? all of them)
And I agree it's not capitalistic to take taxpayer money, but you cant use one thing to define the whole picture. I'd prefer he didn't take subsidies, but he did because he is a smart business man. I would take "free" (yes I know it isn't really free) money, if I knew for a fact that money was going to go to someone else anyways, if it didn't happen to be me that secured it.
but,...but,...he smoked a joint on rogan!
Hm yes, why would a businessman use investor money to reduce his risk instead of his own money? It's truly a mystery. You can't possibly hope to persuade anyone when you mix in garbage like that.
I do plenty of research. This is the board where you back up your claims - you claim hes deepstate, now back it
You backed up nothing. Made a lot of claims with no proof. I don't trust musk either but you have not backed up your claims.