This is a very interesting part of the gospels. But it's clearly not passing the test defined in the book of Revelations. Rev 20 defines the first resurrection. Whatever happened back then was not what Jesus calls the "First".
So Jesus wasn't resurrected? Obviously, the "first" resurrection in the tribulation is the first resurrection of the tribulation. It's called rightly dividing the word.
Well let's remember that The book of Revelations is a very intentional prophecy being shown and dictated to John many years after the events you are suggesting satisfy his "prophecy".
Maybe he wasn't wasting papyrus to explain the obvious. 😁
This is a very interesting part of the gospels. But it's clearly not passing the test defined in the book of Revelations. Rev 20 defines the first resurrection. Whatever happened back then was not what Jesus calls the "First".
I'll trust Him.
So Jesus wasn't resurrected? Obviously, the "first" resurrection in the tribulation is the first resurrection of the tribulation. It's called rightly dividing the word.
Andy 45. U live in flag staff?
Nope. I don't live in Alexandria either.
Lol
Well let's remember that The book of Revelations is a very intentional prophecy being shown and dictated to John many years after the events you are suggesting satisfy his "prophecy".
Maybe he wasn't wasting papyrus to explain the obvious. 😁
He was the first among his brethren.