IN THE SKY ON GOOD FRIDAY !!!
I was driving so my little girl took the photo.
God is on time, every time. †
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
lmao I wrote related to Christianity 300 years post death. I also made it specific that it was not used to early Christians.
What you're not understanding is that language matters. If Chris did not die on a cross but rather a stake or upright log, then the idea of a cross is irrelevant.
What is the next question? Where did the idea of a cross come from? Well we know this one. It came from Constantine 300 years AD.
So the next question becomes "Did the pagan Romans have anything to do with a cross as a symbol or belief?" We know they used it in Babylon, Egypt and even India long before Christianity.
You are arguing terms. I am pointing out a fact that the cross was never mentioned and only arrived in Christianity centuries later.
This is unbelievable that you're this hard headed lol
The language describing what Christ died on translates to stake, not cross. I don't see what you find so hard about this lmao. This is where your problem lies. You associate what you believe to be true with something that doesn't exist. If the original language wanted to call it a cross, they easily could have. However, they used 'xu'lon" which translates to "stake" "wood", not a cross.
Language matters. It matters because one little change can alter an entire event.
Your belief is that he died on the cross yet the language does not confirm this. It describes he died on a stake.
You now wear a cross probably around your neck. This cross has nothing to do with Christ and was introduced later. This is a problem. If you don't understand how something so symbolic yet meaningless is an issue, then you don't understand anything at all.
"veryone was eye-witness to Jesus dying on the cross." <-- there is no evidence of this lmao. None. The language doesn't describe it as a cross but rather a stake. Why are you talking so much shit when you can't even understand the basics of the difference in linguistics?
LMAO a stake is one piece of wood with no adjacent attachments. I'm not even gonna bother reading the retarded shit you wrote after your very first line. I've already described to you the original meaning of the word from it's Greek writing which modern NT are derived from. I've already described to you exactly where the cross symbolism appeared in Christianity.
You have no idea what you're writing about.
You're too dumb for me to have this debate with and now it's confirmed.