Continuing on my multi part series, in part 1 and 2 we discussed how Kushner received a 2 billion dollar investment from the saudi prince, in his start up company only months after trumps admin ended.
We discussed how Kushner front lined the saudi peace deal, how the Trump team helped place Mohammed bin Salman in charge of SA and their various connections. How Trumps sec. of Treasury is Kushner's co worker at Afinity who also worked on the saudi peace deal.
Part 1
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HIm99KZc/so-are-we-just-going-to-ignore-k/
Part 2
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HImBQOnL/over-target-kushner-and-ivanka-c/
These were not well received. Maybe because the negative light it shines on the trump family. But i feel that these deals and connections HAVE to be discussed and brought to light.
In part 3 we'll go over Ivanka Trump's business deals and how she made $640 million dollars DURING the trump presidency.
Ivanka reported $640 million in outside income during the trump presidency.
Some other weird fillings, such as claiming her hotel ownership stake of 25mil was worth only 250k, while not reporting any sale of her stake in the hotels.
Her brand that she closed in 2018, made over 1 mil in 2019.
In 2017, Ivanka’s business won preliminary approval for three Chinese trademarks on the same day that she dined with Chinese President Xi Jinping at Mar-a-Lago. She is approved for 16 new chinese trademarks. These trademarks were approved 1 WEEK before Trump announced he was going to lift the ban on the chinese company ZTE. The same week ivanka had dinner with Xi at Mar-a-Lago.
One of the 16 trademarks approved for Ivanka was a trademark for voting machines. Why is Ivanka being approved for chinese voting machine trademarks?
Several other deals that place while her and Kushner worked for the white house are detailed in this link. https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/jared-and-ivanka-made-up-to-640-million-in-the-white-house/
The trademarks are listed here. https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/ivanka-trump-trademarks/
This brings up countless conflict of interest situations. I want to believe Trump is a white hat but how do we justify his children making $640,000,000 dollars from deals directly effected by his policies? Or a 2 billion dollar kickback investment detailed in part 1 and 2.
Opinions? Thoughts? Please keep this civil. I know this is a touchy subject and that Trump is seen as somewhat of a saint around here. But can anyone explain how this is an different than the typical top level criminal activity that takes place with political families? Clinton's, Biden's, Bush's etc etc.
You keep doing it. I didn't justify anything. That is NOT what I am saying. Can you please try to appreciate that from my perspective, you are completely missing what I am saying?
Crime is crime. But we are watching a fucking Show. Until you realize what is going on you can't appreciate the players within the show.
There is nothing that happened during Trump's presidency (at least with regards to the Trump family) that wasn't by design. If it turns out that crimes were committed (which I seriously doubt, though maybe), then that was by design for the Show.
THAT is why I say, Who Fucking Cares. It's like talking about a murderer in a movie and asking why the actor isn't in prison.
If you don't realize this is A Show, you need to do more research.
Umm...
Well of course this is a show, but these actors have a real world effect. The money that these actors make in their move is real. Its real and illegal.
Its like if an actor actually killed someone in a movie. Thats still a crime. Unless youre alex baldwin apparently, but still. When trump said in his movie that people should take the vaccine, people in the real world actually took it. Children died because of it that actors actions.
Thats why i care. The actions of these actors are real.
When the movie is over will they give that 2.7 billion back? Because that was real money the actors were using.
The problem you are having is one of scope. You still think this is about crimes of people. This is about all crimes. These "actors" didn't do anything without direction. If they committed a crime, it was because they were told to do so. In the case of Trump, if he committed a crime, it was because Q told him to do so.
The directors are telling people what to do. I don't think that's true for everyone, but it is true for some. I'm fairly certain it's true for all, or at least most of the world leaders. I think all of the Presidents, Prime Ministers, Dictators, etc. (Putin e.g.) are all acting according to a script. I can't say that for sure of course. A lot of that is speculation, though there are clues that support the assertion. But for Trump and his family, it is almost certainly true. The evidence for that is overwhelming, and it has been since before he got elected.
Any crimes that have happened (IF they happened, which your case is far from sufficient) are by direction only. No real conflicts of interest exist. No real crimes have been committed. It's a Show, top to bottom, opening to closing Act.
As I said in the beginning, we must learn that We are our saviors. That lesson is going to cost lives. The alternative was very likely all of humanity living in abject slavery for all time.
Death happens in war. In this case, all people who died, died by choice. I doubt there were all that many that were swayed by Trumps pushing of it. In fact, I don't know a single one, and I've never heard of a single one, but who knows, maybe there were a couple. But look at all those who have learned not to Trust Trump. That lesson is well worth a few deaths that were done by the persons own choice, because it is the only way to save the human race.