A Friend just emailed me the following. What do you think? It must have cost a fortune. Is this a deep state entrée to Project Bluebeam or genuine independent research?
.
Last night I watched an amazing interview and sneak premier with Caroline Cory (a quite attractive lady that I have begun following her, as I love her smile), on the 3-day conference "Portal to ascension" this weekend. Last July she and a big team, well financed team went to Catalina Island, south of L.A., to triangulate a UFO appearing out of nowhere and film it - using high-end cameras, night goggles for the infrared end of the spectrum, and a gamma ray detector, for measuring the level of ambient radiation in the area. The 'nabbed' it in this 90 minute high budget documentary, "A Tear in the Sky" (https://www.atearinthesky.com), to be released in May, both online and all across America in theatres. Watch the 3 minute trailer at https://youtu.be/lm3OTrWwjO0?t=20080 (minute 5:34:41-5:37:00), with discussions before and after the trailer. Some highlights: at 5:35:42 and 5:36:58 you see iconic Michio Kaku ("Mr. Science" on the History channel, quite a well-accepted, mainstream physicist - who discovered string theory) saying, "In history, we need the smoking gun that'll clinch it once and for all. We'll settle the debate -- no ifs, ands or buts -- and in the process rewrite all of human history." See a quick tease of the wormhole in the sky, out of which the UFOs make their appearance at minutes 5:37:13. (You'll have to wait until next month for the full release).
In case you misunderstand the word proponent, it means someone who pushes the fake AGW narrative.
‘No effing clue what he is talking about’: Meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue Calls Warmist Physics Prof. Michio Kaku of NY City College ‘a festering wound on field of meteorology’ for Kaku’s blaming ‘excess heat’ on record cold and snow
Lol! Yes, my bad! I don't usually misunderstand that word, but this time I did!
I will be subtracting that "respect point" from him now.
The reason I favor him over the other dbags in his profession is due to his ostensibly earnest admission that he would be genuinely pleased to learn that he was wrong. The rest of them are intoxicated on hubris, and do not (at least appear to) feel that way.
I thought this was another example of a sagan-esque smackdown (of evolutionary biology at an international conference). Too bad :(