I don't want to see this community get dragged off through the dirt saying things that essentially allows the cabal to make us look like a bunch of idiots by playing to our whistleblower loving nature.
How many things have we learned about the spike protein in the last 2 years?
We have the initial reports from, I believe it was India, where they determined that the coronavirus is a hybrid of about five different viruses. There's crispr cas-9 markers all over it. It has the HIV cleavage mechanism attached to the spike protein of a common cold (corona) virus spike protein. It's patent is co-owned by Fauci and Gates from 2002.
Coronavirus is a real virus, it never needed to be isolated because it's not wild, it's developed plus there are traditional vaccines for coronavirus in development and on the market, but that data is not freely available for everyone and not every country can just get it to defend themselves in a court case when they want it, people pushing this in court are going to run out of luck eventually. You can also tell because when you find the same genetic code and people all over the world that there's something common spreading between them. My mom had alpha and some friends had alpha, and a part-time slut/psw in town brought the virus into the old age home from customers she had up to party with her in her home. She killed half the nursing home and it was super obvious and highly traceable because we only have 8,000 people in town and literally no one else had coronavirus. It wasn't like the flu. Half the nursing home died at the same time.
Never forget the Cabals plan: How do they get the masses to take gene therapy?
1: develop a real virus that varies a real bioweapon: it needs to have high transmission and a realistically high mortality rate and leave laying damage in survivors so that people are scared and even the scientists get caught
2: release the virus in China: it will obfuscate guilt and put attention into the, already known to be evil, CCP instead of Western authorities
3: use the deaths of the virus to stoke fear
4: remove freedom and make life miserable, tell people salvation is coming from the medical community
5: once they are desperate for lives back, release the bioweapon in the guise of a vaccine
6: reveal the bio weapon to the population eventually to start a collapse of government and allow the world economic forum and its partners to come in offering salvation from the failing system
Then we have to have more questions if it's going to be snake venom on top of it:
- how many doctors and scientists did we post speaking about this virus and spike protein that would now just be complete b******* because one chiropractor using google says it's snake venom?
- was every single doctor and scientist in that room presenting to Senator Ron Johnson a complete and total idiot?
- Dr Robert Malone lied to us? Dr Bean lied to us? Michela rojak from marogenomicd lied to us? Peter McCullough lied to us? The Pfizer scientist sitting in the Pfizer laboratory being interviewed on mainstream news telling us that this thing is poison lied to us? Andre bourla, lied when he testified in European court that his vaccine doesn't work but that would be grateful for it because he used the opportunity to fill us with microtechnology?
- vitamins C, d and zinc help you beat a snake bite?
- monoclonal antibodies work, sure, but this so does ivermectin, which is an antiviral
- what about all the people that died from the fat rafts that the viruses actually physically building inside of their lungs that was causing the scarring that caused them to have a hard time breathing to get them to go into the hospital to be murdered in the first place?
- how do you poison the well in such a way that the people of low constitution (seniors and children) get further divided into two groups by age so that only the seniors with their low constitution are killed by the poison in the well first? If you have a distribution method that can affect large populations in an "outbreak" you absolutely 100% have to explain how the hell it's possible the children were not dying first with the senior citizens.
My point is, for snake venom to be true, we have to either live with cognitive dissonance or say most of everything we dug up in the last 2 years is false and we're all stupid.
I propose we do neither.
Edited for typos. Probably going to continue to edit for typos as I am using my phone for this.
You lost me there.
There are no viruses, exosomes, yes. Can these be manipulated? it seems so. However, exosomes, moving out from the cells itself, are nothing but the clean-up troops. It is a solvent in a way. These items envelope RNA strains and promote them to the colon, where they are discarded with the other basura.
However, traditionally, virus = venom. and poison is a matter of dose. You are familiar with over-dose?
Certain venoms are used to treat certain ailments.
The process that Ardis is describing is rather raw. But what the studies have shown is that spike proteins and bacteria seem to interact producing peptides ALSO found and akin to snake venom, snale venom, etc. These exist in quite a number of types.
What we are liable to suffer is the short handed version of a much more intricate and cynical ploy. And by short handing it, we suffer embarrassment.
How the introduction of an alien and artificially created spike protein is influencing all the mechanism in the body, so we can have a clear picture of the holistic effects, is a process still ongoing. We simply do not know. This effect of creating your own peptides-venom-types is an underrated and neglected field of study.
And the question is: how did the initial patients in Italy, who were, so to speak, infected, wind up with a plethora of several peptides akin to those peptides found in venom?
I probably could go on for another hour with all the questions, and maybe, every aspect does not have to be part of an intended consequence. It may be an unintended consequence.
Think inceptions. A game within a game within a game within a game. It is easy to get lost.
The initial idea was to have a couple of sick people, (especially the elderly as these always in droves succumb to the flu, every season). This would then together with the incessant propagandizing of the MSN create an image of disaster, and the misleadingly set up RT-PCR test, governments then would in lockstep lockdown, which would create shortages in the supply chain, inflation and a total wreck to the economy. Another factor helping in creating this image, was the false and misleading statements of public-health officials that distancing, mask-wearing and excessive alcohol use to clean hands would be a major weapon in " defeating" this virus. A solution to the pandemic would then have to wait for a couple of years. It woudl give them time to install the basics for the Build Back Better and the 4th industrial revolution tenets. And to really make this happen, all civil law would have to be harmonized with a CBDC based on the QR-code access and user environment.
What happened was people found a different solution: HCQ + zink = verboten. And over the course of 2 years, almost anything defeats this " corona-virus". Ivermectine came on the scene. Any solution to the " virus" and thus the lockdowns was attacked, suppressed, verboten. Yet, people found ways to defeat this mandate.
Masks did not solve anything, they only help to make things worse. WE even were advised to stay indoors, whereas sunlight would help in producing vit D, which defeats the "virus".
And no country' s health officials have provided guidance in healthier lifestyles, better diets, etc. Anything good was turned around into something bad and verboten. You must socially distance! Totally bad, as our immunesystems need practice, and it is the best way to defeat a "virus".
Investigations into aerosols was resisted.
Instead from day 1: a vaxx was pushed. Only a vaxx could safe us. Only big Pharma was our savior.
While this was raging on, the peptide production was completely forgotten. Yet, Trump remained claiming that the virus was a Chayna Virus.
Taking in this whole picture, it becomes easy to see the reality, the propaganda, the fiction.
We can now make a supposition:
What if the initial group was sprayed with an aerosolized concoction, that based on their priming, would cause severe pathologies, just to kick-off the fiction?
You only need a couple of geographically vulnerable places .....
With all of this said: what comes then into view is what the vaxx, meaning the injection of the spike-protein again and again and again in combination with the interaction with bacteria in several places of the body is producing?
You can see now, how difficult it is to make sense of everything if your premise is totally screwed.
Tom Clancy's: Bear and the Dragon, may serve as an example. Here a concoction was used to, in geographically diverse places, spray this concoction and people would get sick, and those with whom they would be in contact would get sick, until the Ebola had raged, but by then, the USA would have been totally ravaged and out of potency to influence the event son the world stage which were the ACTUAL targets ....
Explain: Megavirus chilensis and bacteriophages and watching viruses explode cells in petri dishes if viruses aren't real.
A virus is just a simple parasite.
Better yet, explain the existence of the delivery mechanism for Johnson & Johnson if viruses don't exist.
How about herpes and HPV, explain those two STDs if that's an exosome related issue.
How about dengue fever, the entire life cycle and spread cycle of that virus is like fully studied and very well understood, re-explained that if that's an exosome related issue. Re-explain how the culture dengue fever to study it in the lab if this is an exosome related issue and not a virus issue.
And at what point do you stop calling an exosome and exosome and call it a virus because it has self-replication capabilities that continue to exist in controlled lab conditions?
Virus theory and exosome theory are not exclusionary theories, both phenomena can coexist simultaneously in the real world at the same time and be very difficult to distinguish between until people accept the reality of both theories together and truly study it and get to know it.
Why?
Has any study been provided in which, with strict adherence to a Koch Postulates, a virus
These 3 questions underpin the premise on which virology is based. However, there do not exist such studies, except for one I know of: which just happens to have been done by a certain dutch guy in relation to sars in 2003 and only, only with amending the rules of the game.
Before and ever since, no one has done so. Not because it is hard, but because there is no evidence as a resultant. No instead they' d rather use cultures. Ever read about cultures, and how they do it? If that was your body, you' d be surprised to find yourself transforming into some carbon based blob of shit?
Hence, I do not have to explain. The whole of virology is based on a fraud, and has been known since Pasteur committed the fraud.
What you might be interested in knowing and researching is environment. The body too is an environment. And heavy metals play a role, radiation, etc. And goddamn! are we being bombarded by toxic shit each day. And not satisfied by pollution, chemtrails, radio-waves, these jokers too provide us with GMO food and void nutrients-food, sugar dependency and other shit.
I did not say they cannot co-exist. Viruses can be created based on RNA strains. And gobbledygook: do we have a database of RNA strains to tie together and produce whatever we want? YES. Lab created shit or naturally occurring are two different things. And these assholes, whatever their intention, with their God-complexes and technocratic deterministic arrogance, think it impossible their shit could ever ruin our home?
This is the cleaver path to hoax and corral sheep, who capabilities do not reach beyond thinking in terms of binary and linearity. O and by the way: that is because these assholes designed the school curriculum ....
It can be real and not obey Koch's postulates. They aren't alive. They are self-assembling chemicals and the environment of a living body furnishes the material and ambiance to do so. This is in line, not with Koch and Pasteur's theories, but the contrary and suppressed notion of environmental (internal environment of the body) determination of disease.
I rly like how there’s a logical scientific post and all the sciencetards come out. Love it. We gota fight disinfo on both sides and god. Damn. Is it annoying to do that. Imagine fighting BOTH sides of the disinfo war.