Redditors are worried a Trump conviction will only make him stronger in spite of Huffpost stating the opposite, and are losing their shit because they're sensing the culture at large is branding the Democrats as pedophile groomers and the party as the pedo-commie deep state
(media.greatawakening.win)
😷 DEM PANIC 💉
Total nonsense. We got there in 1969, landed, and returned. No harnesses, wires, etc. As I said, impossible to duplicate the behavior of grit in a vacuum and low gravity. (I notice you don't dispute that.) It doesn't matter what the Russians think. They were operating under communism, which barely allowed the world to even know that Gagarin had orbited. We didn't know for many years afterward what his capsule design was. (I recall quite clearly, being there at the time.) You don't validate your ignorance by referring to someone else's ignorance.
Whenever I notice someone is emotionally invested in their certainty of a specific version of reality, it only makes me MORE skeptical that the psyop is working exactly as designed.
Space is not fake. But whatever documentation of the moon landing the American population was shown, absolutely was.
Not in any way. You get to provide evidence to the contrary. Failing to understand what you are looking at is not evidence. (Most of the "evidence" that people propose is simple ignorance about photography and optics.)
https://youtu.be/2_1GYtoLj2o
Watch just the first 15 minutes of this documentary. I don't buy into too many of the claims here for I've taken enough basic college Astronomy and physics courses myself to know the explanations for phenomenon such as why the world can spin so fast without us feeling it.
Such explanations are relatively simple and involve knowing the difference between acceleration vs velocity as well as how motion is perceived within a system vs outside of it.
(For example, when you're inside a plane moving at 600 mph north, a flight attendant can walk south down the aisle at 1mph without her trajectory being directly impacted by the planes motion because she is moving within the system).
However, the footage demonstrated regarding the Apollo 11 moon mission that was shown to the public, is impossible to disregard. At the very least deserves unbiased additional scrutiny.
Look, I don't have time to waste on a video. If you can't state your point in a sentence or two, you don't understand it. (Since you said 15 minutes, I sampled it. Not impressed. Plenty of confusion. If you think you have caught NASA in a glitch bring it to them and get their story. But these are cherries. Plenty of authentic footage.)
As for why we can't feel the Earth's rotation---the acceleration is too small to feel. Calculate the damn numbers; I did. But it is enough to cause coriolis effects on our weather systems, causing cyclones.
If you have something specific about Apollo 11, lay it on the table.
Lmao bro I literally agreed that there was a simple explanation for why we can't feel the extraordinary velocity of the rotation of the earth.
It is clear your panties as caught in a bunch and you have no desire in having your identity as a "Science guy", being potentially shown to not be impervious to lies and deceit.
How can a person distrust Big Pharma for being corrupt and deceptive and then turn around and defend NASA so steadfast is beyond me. Dissonance is a hell of a drug.
You see, the problem is in framing it in absolutes. NASA isn't all lies or truths. Up through the Apollo program, they were very straightforward. And even afterward. But the ideologues came into play about the 1980s, and their "work" on "climate change" has been nearly nonstop hoax.
Some of the video images are questionable, but who knows where that image has been? Is there an archive number? Can I reach out to NASA and find that footage? Has anybody made a practice of pointing out a feature and asking NASA what is up?
It is not out of keeping with their lofty attitude to tinker with things to make them more attractive---like all the false-color renderings of planets. The false color images are instructive in providing contrast for otherwise imperceptible details, but they are offered so frequently and caveated so poorly that people come to think of these as real images. When stewardship morphs into showmanship.
And Big Pharma still makes legitimate medicines (I take a lot of them).