Samsung Heavy Industries Partners With Denmark's Seaborg to Develop Floating Nuclear Power Plants
(web.archive.org)
🤓 BILL GAYTES 🏳️🌈 WTF!?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (61)
sorted by:
Floating nuke power plants doesn't sit right with me.
To me, the biggest issue is sabotage and it's difficult to protect. Right?
Aircraft carriers and subs are floating nuke plants.
Currently from now until year 2100, overall safety-wise, thorium nuclear is very promising. It does not operate under the higher pressures of uranium, shutdowns are far more agreeable. Economics at scale, cost, years to profit, have stagnated its progress.
https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Indian-test-reactor-reaches-operation-landmark
https://whatisnuclear.com/thorium.html
Year 2100+, we should be extracting uranium from ocean waters as it's more economic at scale, more bountiful than trying to dig it from the earth's crust. Technologies from extraction methods should be more readily accessible then.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/uranium-from-seawater
Reading through this thread makes me sad, that people still fear the backlash from the downfalls of nuclear. Yes, it's worries are understandable. But people gotta start realizing sooner or later, Tesla's free energy isn't walking through the door. Solar, wind, coal, isn't cutting it in terms of efficiency, cost, or in coal's case, appeasing to the silly whimsicals of lefties. Nuclear is the definitively, the only studied option for the foreseeable future of mankind.
If people are worried about terrorist threats to offshore nuke plants, a single destroyer is more than enough to patrol its safety.
Were they joking about zero point energy in those emails?
Tesla's free energy will be available when the Cabal keeping it suppressed is destroyed.