Some claimed that Project Looking Glass had predicted a "mass casualty event" occurring on April 18th, followed by a series of bigger events.
Predicting the future has never been an accurate science. I believe there is some validity to looking at probabilities and extrapolating timelines of several probable series of events to look for places where the lines conjoin in the future. That is basically what they are doing. In this case, the predicted date was wrong.
As it's not an exact science, I generally take any "project looking glass" predictions to mean that conditions are ripe for the predicted outcome to occur. Just as with tornado weather, just because conditions are ripe doesn't mean there will be a tornado. It also doesn't mean one will form where or when it was predicted... but only that the conditions were ideal for one to happen.
Looking at all the correct predictions by Q (with all the “coincidental” deltas), I’d say it’s an inaccurate science only for those not touched by Jesus.
I don't have a video link.
Some claimed that Project Looking Glass had predicted a "mass casualty event" occurring on April 18th, followed by a series of bigger events.
Predicting the future has never been an accurate science. I believe there is some validity to looking at probabilities and extrapolating timelines of several probable series of events to look for places where the lines conjoin in the future. That is basically what they are doing. In this case, the predicted date was wrong.
As it's not an exact science, I generally take any "project looking glass" predictions to mean that conditions are ripe for the predicted outcome to occur. Just as with tornado weather, just because conditions are ripe doesn't mean there will be a tornado. It also doesn't mean one will form where or when it was predicted... but only that the conditions were ideal for one to happen.
Looking at all the correct predictions by Q (with all the “coincidental” deltas), I’d say it’s an inaccurate science only for those not touched by Jesus.