That's probably a good rule of thumb. The younger and "less qualified" they are the less compromised they may be as well.
I'm convinced that one of the "qualifications" for many positions of power in the United States is successful blackmail on a person. Once they are successfully blackmailed, they are controlled, and then elevated into higher positions of power.
In this way, their puppet masters control them for all of their days. I'm convinced this has happened to John Roberts, as an example.
If someone said this is how most politicians, business leaders, and judges get elevated to higher and higher positions of power, I would believe them.
Anonymous Conservative covers this subject heavily. The current in use surveillance system from boots on the ground to the tech used is going to blow minds with how vast it is. Watching for “problematic” children who as they grow older could pose issues.
Blackmail is the glue that holds it all together.
I’ll use the American Bar Assn as a barometer for good judges: if they deem a judge “unqualified” then the judge is probably a good one.
That's probably a good rule of thumb. The younger and "less qualified" they are the less compromised they may be as well.
I'm convinced that one of the "qualifications" for many positions of power in the United States is successful blackmail on a person. Once they are successfully blackmailed, they are controlled, and then elevated into higher positions of power.
In this way, their puppet masters control them for all of their days. I'm convinced this has happened to John Roberts, as an example.
If someone said this is how most politicians, business leaders, and judges get elevated to higher and higher positions of power, I would believe them.
Anonymous Conservative covers this subject heavily. The current in use surveillance system from boots on the ground to the tech used is going to blow minds with how vast it is. Watching for “problematic” children who as they grow older could pose issues. Blackmail is the glue that holds it all together.