Well pal, thanks, but Q talked about "misspellings" in the Q drops, indicating that they are not accidental (except when indicated; several times Q wrote a drop with a misspelling and quickly followed it up with a drop that said (paraphrase) "ignore that misspelling, I (we're) on the move" indicating that it was indeed a mistake in that case, because he (they) were using a device while moving.

In the OP, the "misspelling" is something an anon wrote, not what Q wrote, and Q never, ever, ever, never, wrote anything to imply that misspellings by anons are "comms".

See the point? the fren above heard something about Q, was not actually properly informed or misunderstood what he (she) had heard, and then went with the idea that somehow, a comment by an anon on the board was "comms" because intentional misspellings by Q are intentional. And this, pal, is just plain wrong.

Some of us actually have a vested interest in seeing that Q is properly and well understood.

Do you see? With Q, you cannot just invest a half effort or a glance and assume that you know what is going on. Some of us have invested hundreds and thousands of hours over the last 5 years to work with and understand and convey what Q actually is. It's a constant battle, because the Cabal and the Deep State are constantly attempting to confuse people and mislead the population as to what Q is, etc. But it's also a battle here, because as the number of anons grows, more and more newbies come in and just run with loose ideas that are not based on actual Q content or work.

We should all be making as much effort as possible to build up and promote solid, Q-based understanding of Q.

Have a great day, fren (pal).