This is just one of many reasons the claim that "cops who viewed the laptop committed suicide/died/were killed" is obviously a LIE.
That info has never come from any official source, just hearsay from people with no authority.
No list of such has ever been released by the NYPD.
No one from the NYPD has ever confirmed any contents of the laptop.
You did not read any articles about multiple cops committing suicide in their cars. Link them and I'll venmo you $100 right now.
There have been screenshots out on the web, but I have not downloaded them, nor do I want such an image on my personal devices.
No, there haven't. They only ones that have ever been shown are proven fakes.
Does it not bother you or at least give you pause that the majority of people who swear they've seen the video have all used pics, screenshots and clips that have been proven fake? EVERY SINGLE ONE. There has never been one piece of evidence of that video that hasn't been debunked. Yet for some reason you continue to take these anonymous hucksters at their word?
Wanting something to be true because you hate the person it incriminates isn't proof.
The burden of proof isn't on me, I'm not the one making outlandish claims about the existence of a fictitious cartoonish nightmare snuff film.
Show me one, JUST ONE piece of actual evidence or a source that supports anything you've said. And no, claims from randos on alleged videos you say you've transcribed do not count.
#1 - You are quite funny. You say THE ONLY ONES THAT HAVE EVER BEEN SHOWN are proven fake. That is hilarious. No they haven't. So, you are telling us that you've seen EVERY image that this board collectively has seen (but hasn't posted) and you can prove definitively that ALL OF THEM (that you haven't seen) ARE fake? How can you possibly say this? Unless...
YOU, you yourself have access to the real deal and haven't shared it with anyone, anywhere. Is this what you are saying? Shall we have you arrested?
Or, are you with the FBLie? Are you with the Clowns In America? Do you glow when you turn the lights out?
#2 - Clearly you didn't read the warrant you provided that you think proves that the NYPD didn't have access to the laptop. Please follow along (if you can...)
~In the "Search and Seizure Warrant" it says:
To: Any authorized law enforcement officer. (This could include NYPD)
and;
~"The officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during the execution of the warrant, must prepare an inventory as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to the Clerk of the Court. (Officer = NYPD)
~"Law enforcement personnel (including, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents [FBLie] , attorneys for the government,....agency personnel assisting this investigation and outside technical experts...are authorized to review the ESI [Electronically Stored Information] contained on the Subject Devices...
~This warrant also authorizes the copying of electronically stored information for later review..which may be seized or copied without limitation.
#1 - You are quite funny. You say THE ONLY ONES THAT HAVE EVER BEEN SHOWN are proven fake. That is hilarious. No they haven't. So, you are telling us that you've seen EVERY image that this board collectively has seen (but hasn't posted) and you can prove definitively that ALL OF THEM (that you haven't seen) ARE fake? How can you possibly say this?
Okay, I'll rephrase...every single one that's ever been publicly revealed has been fake. You may be willing to believe tales from people who claim they saw it but can offer no proof, or someone who knows someone who knows someone that says they saw it, but I need actual evidence before I'll accept ANY claim
YOU, you yourself have access to the real deal and haven't shared it with anyone, anywhere. Is this what you are saying? Shall we have you arrested?
LMAO Why would I be arrested when the people who supposedly turn into real life versions of Leatherface and eat children on video haven't even been so much as interrogated?
Also it's impossible to have access to something that doesn't exist.
You also failed to understand the chain of custody portion of the warrant, and are misinterpreting it. Which doesn't surprise me, since you believe frazzledrip is real.
Translation: Now that you're faced with objective facts you can't offer any possible retort that refutes any of the points I've made, so now you'll just toss out some empty insult and avoid any further discussion entirely/
Here's excerpts from the article titled:
"NYPD & Feds Unveil Details of Anthony Weiner’s Illegal Texts with 14-yr-old Girl"
"New York Police Department detectives and federal prosecutors working an underage sexting case against Anthony Weiner now confirm that the former Congressman allegedly swapped exclusive sexual texts and images with a high school girl who was 14 years old at the time he engaged the online relationship."
As first reported three months ago by True Pundit, Weiner and other Hillary Clinton associates could be facing possible federal charges of child exploitation, sex crimes with minors and possible other felony charges including child pornography.
These details were originally documented in an exclusive Nov. 2, 2016 story published by True Pundit which in part specifies:
The NYPD seized the computer from Weiner during a search warrant and detectives discovered a trove of over 500,000 emails to and from Hillary Clinton, (Huma) Abedin and other insiders during her tenure as secretary of state. The content of those emails sparked the FBI to reopen its defunct email investigation into Clinton on Friday.
But new revelations on the contents of that laptop, according to law enforcement sources, implicate the Democratic presidential candidate, her subordinates, and even select elected officials in far more alleged serious crimes than mishandling classified and top secret emails, sources said. NYPD sources said these new emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to:
•Money laundering
•Child exploitation
•Sex crimes with minors (children)
•Perjury
•Pay to play through Clinton Foundation
•Obstruction of justice
•Other felony crimes
NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director James Comey and many FBI field offices.
“What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”
The NYPD Chief said once Comey saw the alarming contents of the emails he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against Clinton.
“People are going to prison,” he said.
So you trust a source where all these damning quotes come from the very reliable police detectives named…
Hmm. “NYPD Police Chief.”
And “sources.”
What cruel parents these cops had.
It should stand out to you that nobody being quoted in this article seems to have a real name, despite having a job that would have warranted having a name in a news article (like “NYPD chief”).
It should stand out to you that none of these quotes seem to appear in any other source, anywhere, that isn’t quoting this one.
NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director James Comey and many FBI field offices.
So first off, no, they said nothing openly, since they aren’t being quoted with attribution.
Second, this article is from 2017, and so the time for a timely indictment has passed. Where is the damaging emails that were promised?
This source may or may not be describing the truth, but it does an abysmal job of proving it or establishing its own credibility.
NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director James Comey and many FBI field offices.
They "said openly", yet there's no record of this happening at all. No video, no transcripts, press conference, press release, NOTHING. And not a single "source" is named.
Also have you not noticed their threat to "go public" with the contents never actually happened?
“What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “**There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. **
Except for the fact that no one has been charged, arrested, prosecuted whatsoever.
We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”
Again, NONE of this happened. Its's been years, and no wikileaks, no press conference.
How is it you're so oblivious to the fact that this is all bullshit?
Here's the chain of custody for the laptop. The NYPD never even had it. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4465430-WEINER-Search-Warrant-2016.html
This is just one of many reasons the claim that "cops who viewed the laptop committed suicide/died/were killed" is obviously a LIE.
No, there haven't. They only ones that have ever been shown are proven fakes.
Does it not bother you or at least give you pause that the majority of people who swear they've seen the video have all used pics, screenshots and clips that have been proven fake? EVERY SINGLE ONE. There has never been one piece of evidence of that video that hasn't been debunked. Yet for some reason you continue to take these anonymous hucksters at their word?
Wanting something to be true because you hate the person it incriminates isn't proof.
The burden of proof isn't on me, I'm not the one making outlandish claims about the existence of a fictitious cartoonish nightmare snuff film.
Show me one, JUST ONE piece of actual evidence or a source that supports anything you've said. And no, claims from randos on alleged videos you say you've transcribed do not count.
#1 - You are quite funny. You say THE ONLY ONES THAT HAVE EVER BEEN SHOWN are proven fake. That is hilarious. No they haven't. So, you are telling us that you've seen EVERY image that this board collectively has seen (but hasn't posted) and you can prove definitively that ALL OF THEM (that you haven't seen) ARE fake? How can you possibly say this? Unless...
YOU, you yourself have access to the real deal and haven't shared it with anyone, anywhere. Is this what you are saying? Shall we have you arrested?
Or, are you with the FBLie? Are you with the Clowns In America? Do you glow when you turn the lights out?
#2 - Clearly you didn't read the warrant you provided that you think proves that the NYPD didn't have access to the laptop. Please follow along (if you can...)
~In the "Search and Seizure Warrant" it says: To: Any authorized law enforcement officer. (This could include NYPD) and;
~"The officer executing this warrant, or an officer present during the execution of the warrant, must prepare an inventory as required by law and promptly return this warrant and inventory to the Clerk of the Court. (Officer = NYPD)
~"Law enforcement personnel (including, in addition to law enforcement officers and agents [FBLie] , attorneys for the government,....agency personnel assisting this investigation and outside technical experts...are authorized to review the ESI [Electronically Stored Information] contained on the Subject Devices...
~This warrant also authorizes the copying of electronically stored information for later review..which may be seized or copied without limitation.
Okay, I'll rephrase...every single one that's ever been publicly revealed has been fake. You may be willing to believe tales from people who claim they saw it but can offer no proof, or someone who knows someone who knows someone that says they saw it, but I need actual evidence before I'll accept ANY claim
LMAO Why would I be arrested when the people who supposedly turn into real life versions of Leatherface and eat children on video haven't even been so much as interrogated?
Also it's impossible to have access to something that doesn't exist.
You also failed to understand the chain of custody portion of the warrant, and are misinterpreting it. Which doesn't surprise me, since you believe frazzledrip is real.
You must have a very bad inferiority complex. Sorry for ya fella.
Translation: Now that you're faced with objective facts you can't offer any possible retort that refutes any of the points I've made, so now you'll just toss out some empty insult and avoid any further discussion entirely/
And you ask for 'JUST ONE piece of actual evidence' that supports what I've said.
Here you go: https://truepundit.com/nypd-feds-unveil-details-of-anthony-weiners-illegal-texts-with-14-yr-old-girl/
Here's excerpts from the article titled: "NYPD & Feds Unveil Details of Anthony Weiner’s Illegal Texts with 14-yr-old Girl"
"New York Police Department detectives and federal prosecutors working an underage sexting case against Anthony Weiner now confirm that the former Congressman allegedly swapped exclusive sexual texts and images with a high school girl who was 14 years old at the time he engaged the online relationship."
As first reported three months ago by True Pundit, Weiner and other Hillary Clinton associates could be facing possible federal charges of child exploitation, sex crimes with minors and possible other felony charges including child pornography.
These details were originally documented in an exclusive Nov. 2, 2016 story published by True Pundit which in part specifies:
The NYPD seized the computer from Weiner during a search warrant and detectives discovered a trove of over 500,000 emails to and from Hillary Clinton, (Huma) Abedin and other insiders during her tenure as secretary of state. The content of those emails sparked the FBI to reopen its defunct email investigation into Clinton on Friday.
But new revelations on the contents of that laptop, according to law enforcement sources, implicate the Democratic presidential candidate, her subordinates, and even select elected officials in far more alleged serious crimes than mishandling classified and top secret emails, sources said. NYPD sources said these new emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to:
•Money laundering
•Child exploitation
•Sex crimes with minors (children)
•Perjury
•Pay to play through Clinton Foundation
•Obstruction of justice
•Other felony crimes
NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director James Comey and many FBI field offices.
“What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”
The NYPD Chief said once Comey saw the alarming contents of the emails he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against Clinton. “People are going to prison,” he said.
So you trust a source where all these damning quotes come from the very reliable police detectives named…
Hmm. “NYPD Police Chief.”
And “sources.”
What cruel parents these cops had.
It should stand out to you that nobody being quoted in this article seems to have a real name, despite having a job that would have warranted having a name in a news article (like “NYPD chief”).
It should stand out to you that none of these quotes seem to appear in any other source, anywhere, that isn’t quoting this one.
So first off, no, they said nothing openly, since they aren’t being quoted with attribution.
Second, this article is from 2017, and so the time for a timely indictment has passed. Where is the damaging emails that were promised?
This source may or may not be describing the truth, but it does an abysmal job of proving it or establishing its own credibility.
They "said openly", yet there's no record of this happening at all. No video, no transcripts, press conference, press release, NOTHING. And not a single "source" is named.
Also have you not noticed their threat to "go public" with the contents never actually happened?
Except for the fact that no one has been charged, arrested, prosecuted whatsoever.
Again, NONE of this happened. Its's been years, and no wikileaks, no press conference.
How is it you're so oblivious to the fact that this is all bullshit?