Heard his name here and there on the forum but never got into listening regularly. What’s his angle? Is he a Qtard? Doesn’t sound like it from what I’m getting so far. Is he “predicting” based on history cycles or is he using astrological planetary alignments or both to come to his “temporal markers” and other ideas?
Thanks in advance.
There's no drag in space so there is no "follow" because the larger frame of reference is irrelevant, from the planets' point of view the sun isn't going anywhere. Adjacent objects either fly past each other, orbit around a common center of gravity, or collide. There is no fourth option. The helical model means we could never see inner and outer planets next to each other in the sky which happens regularly. Sun angles and seasonal changes also wouldn't match observations. It's flat earth level BS which means Clif isn't as smart as he thinks he is.
Yes it does. "Orbit" and "follow" are mutually exclusive. In reality, the planets wouldn't all stay "behind" the sun for long because with no drag, there is no "behind" and the sun's gravity would quickly pull them around to the other side, resulting in either collisions or circular orbits. You know, just like what we observe is actually happening.