Oh the flip side if you had the shot in less than 5 mth, couldn’t you argue the vaccine is at full potential ie your body hasn’t had time to clear out the stuff inside the vax?
But I think if your body could actually 'clear out the stuff inside the vax', you could argue that the vax is only a 'short-term threat'.
We certainly don't know all of the things the vasxx does, but one that is confirmed is some sort of 'excess clotting'. That seems like an (insidious) long-term threat.
If it doesn't kill you (in the short term), then it weakens (strangles) your body from the inside - leaving you more susceptible to any number of ailments.
I don't think we will truly know what's going on until after a 'purge' of the medical industry. Just too many lies right now.
It’s also interesting that you test positive at a higher rate after the vaxx has been in for more than 5 months.
The ones that have a more recent booster have a slightly lower positivity rate. Almost closer to the unvaccinated but not quite. Interesting. Sure makes the VAIDS or ADE idea more plausible.
If I trusted the data (and I don't), I could argue that there seems to be (at least) two aspects of the vax - (1) something that lowers C-19 susceptibility in the short term (but wears off), and (2) something else that harms you 'generally' in the long term.
In reality, I think there are far more than two aspects of the vax.
I'm just staying unvaxxed, and waiting (somewhat patiently) for the medical industry to be purged.
Very misleading graph. (Is it intentional?)
The columns are out of chronological order. The '2 doses greater than 5 months' should be to the right of the more 'less than 5 months'.
The proper order should be:
If the columns are rearranged, it is far easier to see the pattern: The longer you are vaxxed, the more susceptible you are.
Oh the flip side if you had the shot in less than 5 mth, couldn’t you argue the vaccine is at full potential ie your body hasn’t had time to clear out the stuff inside the vax?
Fair comment.
But I think if your body could actually 'clear out the stuff inside the vax', you could argue that the vax is only a 'short-term threat'.
We certainly don't know all of the things the vasxx does, but one that is confirmed is some sort of 'excess clotting'. That seems like an (insidious) long-term threat.
If it doesn't kill you (in the short term), then it weakens (strangles) your body from the inside - leaving you more susceptible to any number of ailments.
I don't think we will truly know what's going on until after a 'purge' of the medical industry. Just too many lies right now.
It’s also interesting that you test positive at a higher rate after the vaxx has been in for more than 5 months.
The ones that have a more recent booster have a slightly lower positivity rate. Almost closer to the unvaccinated but not quite. Interesting. Sure makes the VAIDS or ADE idea more plausible.
If I trusted the data (and I don't), I could argue that there seems to be (at least) two aspects of the vax - (1) something that lowers C-19 susceptibility in the short term (but wears off), and (2) something else that harms you 'generally' in the long term.
In reality, I think there are far more than two aspects of the vax.
I'm just staying unvaxxed, and waiting (somewhat patiently) for the medical industry to be purged.