If I trusted the data (and I don't), I could argue that there seems to be (at least) two aspects of the vax - (1) something that lowers C-19 susceptibility in the short term (but wears off), and (2) something else that harms you 'generally' in the long term.
In reality, I think there are far more than two aspects of the vax.
I'm just staying unvaxxed, and waiting (somewhat patiently) for the medical industry to be purged.
If I trusted the data (and I don't), I could argue that there seems to be (at least) two aspects of the vax - (1) something that lowers C-19 susceptibility in the short term (but wears off), and (2) something else that harms you 'generally' in the long term.
In reality, I think there are far more than two aspects of the vax.
I'm just staying unvaxxed, and waiting (somewhat patiently) for the medical industry to be purged.
It’s also interesting that the only group that tested positive at a lower rate compared to the proportion of tests done is the unvaxxed group.
For a while I was struggling to understand why there were so many unvaxxed (i.e., NON-brainwashed) were getting tested.
Then I remembered the (job-related) mandatory weekly testing.
So many variables to take into consideration. Too little transparency on the data.