My take: if you think there's no truth to it, then Stew Peters did his job well.
the snake venom part is partly true
the water part is mostly fake
Stew Peters took the truthful part and intentionally buried it in as much mumbo-jumbo as he could goad his first to say. Dr Ardis, not a perfect spokesman, was set up.
TLDW- Covid is a bioweapon that uses synthetic proteins, including from two snakes among other things, wrapped up in something that spreads in droplets (water) like a regular flu, not primarily airborne. The vaccines are similarly dangerous proteins wrapped in a different, more effective vector.
Why does it matter? 1) It leads to correct therapy for the injured, has saved lives and will save more. The fact that this fellow has been recommending effective therapies for over a year despite arriving at it from a different perspective indicates it's not coincidence. 2) It's the answer to the "what happened?" question for investigators. It's part of the how. The who, where and when become easier as a result of correctly identifying the "what." 3) We now know to look left when Stew Peters points right.
My take: if you think there's no truth to it, then Stew Peters did his job well.
Here's another guy (Tau Braun)who is harder to crack, in an interview with Dr Ardis. Jump to the 50-minute mark. https://rumble.com/v10o3sj-the-doctor-who-figured-it-out-before-dr.-ardis.html. The first 40 minutes gives him credibility if you care to listen. Or ...
TLDW- Covid is a bioweapon that uses synthetic proteins, including from two snakes among other things, wrapped up in something that spreads in droplets (water) like a regular flu, not primarily airborne. The vaccines are similarly dangerous proteins wrapped in a different, more effective vector.
Why does it matter? 1) It leads to correct therapy for the injured, has saved lives and will save more. The fact that this fellow has been recommending effective therapies for over a year despite arriving at it from a different perspective indicates it's not coincidence. 2) It's the answer to the "what happened?" question for investigators. It's part of the how. The who, where and when become easier as a result of correctly identifying the "what." 3) We now know to look left when Stew Peters points right.